After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 80874 - ui-preferences.glade and .c file full on crack
ui-preferences.glade and .c file full on crack
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: gnome-control-center
Classification: Core
Component: Other Preferences
unspecified
Other Linux
: Normal blocker
: GNOME2.0
Assigned To: Control-Center Maintainers
Control-Center Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2002-05-05 19:33 UTC by Ali Akcaagac
Modified: 2004-12-22 21:47 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.0


Attachments
totally fixed glade file. (18.86 KB, text/plain)
2002-05-05 19:36 UTC, Ali Akcaagac
  Details
fixed enumerations in the ui-properties.c file. (7.57 KB, patch)
2002-05-05 19:37 UTC, Ali Akcaagac
none Details | Review
screncap that show what i wanted to point out. (37.02 KB, image/png)
2002-05-06 05:03 UTC, Ali Akcaagac
  Details
DIFF to gnome-ui-properties.c (456 bytes, patch)
2002-05-06 05:04 UTC, Ali Akcaagac
none Details | Review
DIFF to gnome-ui-properties.glade (13.40 KB, patch)
2002-05-06 05:05 UTC, Ali Akcaagac
none Details | Review

Description Ali Akcaagac 2002-05-05 19:33:51 UTC
hello, 
 
i am using gnome-control-center from cvs and for a couple of time i 
realized that it is totally on crack. the dropdown box for the menustyles, 
there are no entries in it so you cant choose what type of menu style one 
wants. the menu styles is full on crack too, you see pixmaps in it (if 
selected) and nothing (if not selected). reviewing the code and the 
gladefile i realized that it is totally corrupt fixed in the past month. 
 
after some investigation i also saw that there are only 3 entries in the 
toolbarstyle which is not correct, if you run glade (gnome2 branch) and 
look how the toolbar changes then you realize that things are not working 
correctly.
Comment 1 Ali Akcaagac 2002-05-05 19:36:04 UTC
Created attachment 8191 [details]
totally fixed glade file.
Comment 2 Ali Akcaagac 2002-05-05 19:37:28 UTC
Created attachment 8192 [details] [review]
fixed enumerations in the ui-properties.c file.
Comment 3 Ali Akcaagac 2002-05-06 05:02:20 UTC
some people reported that they have problems understanding what i 
wanted to say and complained for not sending DIFF's.. 
Comment 4 Ali Akcaagac 2002-05-06 05:03:16 UTC
Created attachment 8210 [details]
screncap that show what i wanted to point out.
Comment 5 Ali Akcaagac 2002-05-06 05:04:30 UTC
Created attachment 8211 [details] [review]
DIFF to gnome-ui-properties.c
Comment 6 Ali Akcaagac 2002-05-06 05:05:14 UTC
Created attachment 8212 [details] [review]
DIFF to gnome-ui-properties.glade
Comment 7 Ali Akcaagac 2002-05-06 09:06:59 UTC
From: Ali Akcaagac <ali.akcaagac@stud.fh-wilhelmshaven.de> 
To: andersca@gnu.org 
Cc: control-center-maint@bugzilla.gnome.org 
Date: 2002-05-06 10:32 
 
hello anders, 
 
can you answer me one question ?... why did you do this ? i mean i 
know you really dont like me and i dont like you either but this is a 
fucked up way to anger people. you saw that patch on bugzilla, 
thought yourself, that fucking asshole doesnt get a single credit. 
fixed the shit yourself commited it one day later (6.5.2002) and 
earned the fucking credits. i mean i worked on that one earlier, 
fixed it and it was on bugzilla one fucking day earlier. this is 
not a nice behaviour. 
 
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show bug.cgi?id=80874 
 
maybe you get a gold medal for this kind of shit. 
friendly regards. 
 
by the way why dont you just rip the bugfixes off from my other 
reports too so you can stuff them into your ass too. 
Comment 8 Luis Villa 2002-05-14 16:55:31 UTC
Not sure why this is still open.