After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 78517 - Caret is not being erased when near the end of the buffer
Caret is not being erased when near the end of the buffer
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 72374
Product: gtk+
Classification: Platform
Component: Widget: GtkTextView
2.0.x
Other other
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: gtk-bugs
gtk-bugs
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2002-04-12 12:57 UTC by Jeroen Zwartepoorte
Modified: 2011-02-04 16:11 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.0

Attachments
patch (1.07 KB, patch)
2003-01-23 23:54 UTC, Matthias Clasen 		none Details | Review

Description Jeroen Zwartepoorte 2002-04-12 12:57:04 UTC 
Run gtk-demo, go to the text widget demo. Go to the end of the document.
Press ENTER. Move the cursor/caret one line up and a couple of characters
further along the line. Now move the cursor down. The caret on the previous
line is not being erased.

Happens with GTK+ cvs head from a couple of days ago.
Comment 1 Owen Taylor 2002-06-14 15:31:15 UTC 
Move GtkTextView 2.0.4 bugs to 2.0.5
Comment 2 Matthias Clasen 2002-11-21 19:00:32 UTC 
Moving bugs from older 2.0.x milestones to 2.0.10.
Comment 3 Matthias Clasen 2002-12-26 20:51:23 UTC 
This still occurs with 2.2.0
Comment 4 Matthias Clasen 2003-01-23 23:54:53 UTC 
Created attachment 13786 [details] [review]
patch
Comment 5 Matthias Clasen 2003-01-23 23:57:56 UTC 
Wrong bug, sorry.
Comment 6 Matthias Clasen 2003-01-24 00:02:00 UTC 
Owen, I believe your validate_yrange patch fixed this one as well, at
least I can't reproduce it anymore.
Comment 7 Owen Taylor 2003-01-24 13:55:44 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 72734 ***
Comment 8 Jeroen Zwartepoorte 2003-01-24 15:31:13 UTC 
Duplicate of a "gnome-pm crashed" bug??? Wrong bug number perhaps?
Comment 9 Owen Taylor 2003-01-24 16:42:42 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 72374 ***