After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 77235 - Nautilus crash at startup
Nautilus crash at startup
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 76179
Product: nautilus
Classification: Core
Component: general
unspecified
Other other
: Normal critical
: ---
Assigned To: Nautilus Maintainers
Nautilus Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2002-04-01 18:02 UTC by aschwin.van.der.woude
Modified: 2004-12-22 21:47 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Description aschwin.van.der.woude 2002-04-01 17:55:47 UTC 
Package: nautilus
Severity: critical
Version: 1.1.11
Synopsis: Nautilus crash at startup
Bugzilla-Product: nautilus
Bugzilla-Component: general
BugBuddy-GnomeVersion: 2.0 (1.114.0)

Description:
Description of Problem:

When logging into gnome2 nautilus crashed.

Steps to reproduce the problem:
1.  Not sure if it is easily reproducable
2. 
3. 

Actual Results:
Crashed nautilus

Expected Results:
Working nautilus

How often does this happen?
First time since gnome2 beta3 is installed

Additional Information:
There is an oafd of another user running, but this is from gnome1



Debugging Information:

[New Thread 1024 (LWP 21567)]
[New Thread 2049 (LWP 21895)]
[New Thread 1026 (LWP 21896)]
[New Thread 2051 (LWP 21897)]
0x40a80e29 in __wait4 () from /lib/libc.so.6

+ Trace 20161

  • #0 __wait4
    from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #1 __DTOR_END__
    from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #2 waitpid
    at wrapsyscall.c line 172
  • #3 libgnomeui_segv_handle
    at gnome-ui-init.c line 593
  • #4 pthread_sighandler
    at signals.c line 97
  • #5 <signal handler called>
  • #6 g_logv
    at gmessages.c line 503
  • #7 g_log
    at gmessages.c line 526
  • #8 g_malloc
    at gmem.c line 141
  • #9 bilinear_make_fast_weights
    at pixops.c line 1202
  • #10 pixops_scale
Comment 1 John Fleck 2002-04-01 20:34:34 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 76179 ***