After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 757643 - shotwell-common: discrepancy in image metadata (license)
shotwell-common: discrepancy in image metadata (license)
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: shotwell
Classification: Other
Component: general
0.22.x
Other Linux
: Normal major
: ---
Assigned To: Shotwell Maintainers
Shotwell Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2015-11-05 17:02 UTC by Joerg C. Frings-Fuerst
Modified: 2016-04-25 19:15 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Attachments
data: Fix contradicting icon license (1.04 KB, patch)
2016-04-25 19:15 UTC, Jens Georg
committed Details | Review

Description Joerg C. Frings-Fuerst 2015-11-05 17:02:28 UTC
Hello,

I forward this bug from Debian[1]:

[quote]
Dear Maintainer,

I've noticed that image 

        /usr/share/shotwell/icons/rejected.svg

have inconsistent licensing metadata:

        LicenseProhibits: http://creativecommons.org/ns#CommercialUse
        WorkLicense: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/

It is a free license and "LicenseProhibits" is probably left by accident 
after changing license in Inkscape (see Document_Properties-->License).

However it looks like additional restriction on top of CC-BY-SA-3.0 or as an 
attempt to use non-free CC-BY-NC-SA-3.0 (assuming incorrect URL of the 
license).

Please investigate.
[/quote]

CU 
Jörg
Comment 1 Joerg C. Frings-Fuerst 2015-11-05 17:07:08 UTC
Hi,

sorry for the missing link: :-(

[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=800902
Comment 2 Joerg C. Frings-Fuerst 2015-12-13 07:44:04 UTC
Hi,

please can someone give a short note about the status of this bug?

Thanks

CU
Jörg
Comment 3 Jens Georg 2016-04-23 12:25:42 UTC
I'll investigate
Comment 4 Jens Georg 2016-04-23 13:47:56 UTC
The icon is from the Breath Icon Theme [1], the licensing is also present in the original file, added in revision 109. Before that, the entry was missing. I'm trying to contact its authors regarding this, but as that was about 7 years ago, I don't have any hope

[1] http://gnome-look.org/content/show.php?content=105873
[2] https://code.launchpad.net/~breathe-dev/breathe-icon-set/trunk
Comment 5 Jens Georg 2016-04-23 20:25:20 UTC
According to one of the maintainers it's a mistake. I'm waiting for confirmation to put the answer here and what to do with the image.
Comment 6 Jens Georg 2016-04-25 18:43:20 UTC
Quoting one of the maintiners from the mail:

"It has been quite awhile, but if NC language slipped into the
licensing somehow, it would have to have been a mistake. The goal of
the project was always for the theme to be included in Ubuntu, adding
the NC clause to the license would have made it unacceptable in either
Ubuntu main or universe.The license, as expressed in both the
COPYING file and debian/copyright was CC-BY-SA-3.0."
Comment 7 Jens Georg 2016-04-25 19:15:13 UTC
Created attachment 326712 [details] [review]
data: Fix contradicting icon license

The icon comes from the Breathe icon theme where it was supposed to be
cc-by-sa. Apparently there was some relicensing from cc-by-nc-sa but the
clause was not removed.

Signed-off-by: Jens Georg <mail@jensge.org>
Comment 8 Jens Georg 2016-04-25 19:15:31 UTC
Attachment 326712 [details] pushed as b33cacf - data: Fix contradicting icon license