After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 752602 - Unclear meaning of string "Not device selected"
Unclear meaning of string "Not device selected"
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Product: gevice
Classification: Other
Component: General
git master (2.0.0)
Other All
: Normal minor
: ---
Assigned To: gevice-maint
gevice-maint
gnome[unmaintained]
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2015-07-19 21:55 UTC by Anders Jonsson
Modified: 2020-03-05 10:24 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---

Attachments
qtdemux: only look for more samples in moofs in pull-mode (1.52 KB, patch)
2015-08-15 13:36 UTC, Thiago Sousa Santos 		rejected Details | Review
not device -> no device (828 bytes, patch)
2017-11-07 16:29 UTC, Anders Jonsson 		none Details | Review

Description Anders Jonsson 2015-07-19 21:55:51 UTC 
Hi,
when reviewing the Swedish translation of gevice I came upon the string "Not device selected". I'm not sure how I should parse it. The current translation assumes it means something like "This is not the selected device".

Is this correct, or is it "No device selected" that is the intended meaning?
Comment 1 Thiago Sousa Santos 2015-08-15 13:36:56 UTC 
Created attachment 309326 [details] [review]
qtdemux: only look for more samples in moofs in pull-mode

For playback of some fragmented formats with qtdemux it will
try to look for the next moof after finishing one but it is only
possible for pull-mode. For playback of streaming fragmented formats
such as DASH it should just not try to look for another moof but
instead wait for more data.
Comment 2 Thiago Sousa Santos 2015-08-15 14:24:27 UTC 
Comment on attachment 309326 [details] [review]
qtdemux: only look for more samples in moofs in pull-mode

Sorry, this was a typo at git-bz
Comment 3 Anders Jonsson 2017-11-07 16:29:45 UTC 
Created attachment 363159 [details] [review]
not device -> no device

Judging from the rest of the code, it look to me like "no device" would be a better fit for the string.
Comment 4 André Klapper 2020-03-05 10:24:19 UTC 
Closing as WONTFIX as this software is not maintained anymore: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/issues/260