After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 742538 - Alarms Redesign
Alarms Redesign
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: gnome-clocks
Classification: Applications
Component: alarms
unspecified
Other Linux
: Normal enhancement
: ---
Assigned To: Clocks maintainer(s)
Clocks maintainer(s)
Depends on:
Blocks: 740786
 
 
Reported: 2015-01-07 17:27 UTC by Lasse Schuirmann
Modified: 2020-11-24 12:46 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---



Description Lasse Schuirmann 2015-01-07 17:27:19 UTC
I'm currently writing the requirements for the alarms component here:
https://wiki.gnome.org/Apps/Clocks/AlarmsRedesign

I see forward to any feedback/additions.
Comment 1 psychoslave 2016-03-16 07:35:47 UTC
Would it be HIG compatible to add a "Add a new alarm" button as the last element of the main part of the pannel ?

So when there is no alarm, rather than "Click the 'New' button", you would have the button to add a clock directly where the user put its first sight, possibly centered like the previously said text. In the case there are already some clock, placing it as the last element would also makes sense to my mind.
Comment 2 Alexandre Franke 2020-11-24 12:46:50 UTC
A redesign happened, closing this as obsolete.

(In reply to psychoslave from comment #1)
> Would it be HIG compatible to add a "Add a new alarm" button as the last
> element of the main part of the pannel ?
> 
> So when there is no alarm, rather than "Click the 'New' button", you would
> have the button to add a clock directly where the user put its first sight,
> possibly centered like the previously said text. In the case there are
> already some clock, placing it as the last element would also makes sense to
> my mind.

The empty state now does that. Nothing at the end of the list when there is one, but the + button is in prime location which makes this unneeded.