GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 705431
Replace MemoryIcon with GBytesIcon
Last modified: 2013-08-18 00:55:01 UTC
The new GBytesIcon in GLib 2.37.6 works exactly the same way as MemoryIcon, so we can drop the code for the latter. This means bumping the GLib dependency from 2.31.10 to 2.37.6. Patch coming.
Created attachment 250786 [details] [review] Replace MemoryIcon with GBytesIcon
Review of attachment 250786 [details] [review]: Good to go
Comment on attachment 250786 [details] [review] Replace MemoryIcon with GBytesIcon Committed to master, thanks. commit db219966e99a5c6416f53ff8fa005853c7195643 Author: Philip Withnall <philip@tecnocode.co.uk> Date: Sun Aug 4 10:57:25 2013 +0200 Bug 705431 — Replace MemoryIcon with GBytesIcon This bumps the GLib dependency to 2.37.6. Closes: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=705431 configure.ac | 2 +- src/Makefile.am | 1 - src/contacts-avatar-dialog.vala | 9 +++++++-- src/memory-icon.vala | 88 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 92 deletions(-)
I've found this on folks as well, so you might apply the same patch in folks. I mean not the same, but the same fix, you know. (In reply to comment #3) > (From update of attachment 250786 [details] [review]) > Committed to master, thanks. > > commit db219966e99a5c6416f53ff8fa005853c7195643 > Author: Philip Withnall <philip@tecnocode.co.uk> > Date: Sun Aug 4 10:57:25 2013 +0200 > > Bug 705431 — Replace MemoryIcon with GBytesIcon > > This bumps the GLib dependency to 2.37.6. > > Closes: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=705431 > > configure.ac | 2 +- > src/Makefile.am | 1 - > src/contacts-avatar-dialog.vala | 9 +++++++-- > src/memory-icon.vala | 88 > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > 4 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 92 deletions(-)
(In reply to comment #4) > I've found this on folks as well, so you might apply the same patch in folks. I > mean not the same, but the same fix, you know. That would be bug #705403. :-)