After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 702478 - Add user dialog - we don't provide much guidance for enterprise login
Add user dialog - we don't provide much guidance for enterprise login
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: gnome-control-center
Classification: Core
Component: User Accounts
git master
Other Linux
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: Ondrej Holy
Control-Center Maintainers
Depends on: 702479
Blocks: 702477
 
 
Reported: 2013-06-17 15:25 UTC by Allan Day
Modified: 2013-08-14 20:32 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 3.7/3.8

Attachments
add an explanation (5.07 KB, patch)
2013-06-26 13:34 UTC, Ondrej Holy 		none Details | Review
screenshot (20.06 KB, image/png)
2013-06-26 13:35 UTC, Ondrej Holy 		  Details
add an explanation (5.19 KB, patch)
2013-06-27 10:01 UTC, Ondrej Holy 		none Details | Review
proposed screenshot (21.02 KB, image/png)
2013-07-03 16:17 UTC, Ondrej Holy 		  Details
add an explanation (5.19 KB, patch)
2013-08-06 08:19 UTC, Ondrej Holy 		committed Details | Review

Description Allan Day 2013-06-17 15:25:38 UTC 
Someone might be drawn to the enterprise login feature, even if they don't know exactly what it is. In this situation, the dialog will be totally ambiguous. Also, if someone isn't that familiar with AD/IPA, there isn't much in the way of guidance, particularly with regards to the domain field.

To deal with this, we should add an explanation of what enterprise login is. We should also add a text which gives a hint about the domain field.

See:

https://raw.github.com/gnome-design-team/gnome-mockups/master/system-settings/users/add-user-account.png
Comment 1 Stef Walter 2013-06-17 16:24:24 UTC 
The design looks good. We really should implement it.

Ondrej, are you interested in this? If so I'll get you setup with some domains to develop against.
Comment 2 Ondrej Holy 2013-06-18 09:26:27 UTC 
Stef, I should to concentrate more on gvfs, so if somebody can take the new design changes (at least the enterprise part), I'd be happy.
Comment 3 Ondrej Holy 2013-06-26 13:34:39 UTC 
Created attachment 247822 [details] [review]
add an explanation
Comment 4 Ondrej Holy 2013-06-26 13:35:06 UTC 
Created attachment 247823 [details]
screenshot
Comment 5 Stef Walter 2013-06-26 16:17:44 UTC 
Does the text wrap correctly? It seems to be forcing the dialog to be wider than necessary.
Comment 6 Ondrej Holy 2013-06-27 10:01:35 UTC 
Created attachment 247890 [details] [review]
add an explanation

That's good note, so there is fixed patch with allowed wrapping. However the dialog looks identical as with the previous patch and has same width just like without these patches (it's too wide because of tab for non-enterprise users )...
Comment 7 Allan Day 2013-06-27 10:06:41 UTC 
(In reply to comment #6)
> Created an attachment (id=247890) [details] [review]
> add an explanation
> 
> That's good note, so there is fixed patch with allowed wrapping. However the
> dialog looks identical as with the previous patch and has same width just like
> without these patches (it's too wide because of tab for non-enterprise users
> )...

You could limit it to the width of the controls underneath?
Comment 8 Ondrej Holy 2013-07-03 16:17:22 UTC 
Created attachment 248329 [details]
proposed screenshot

(In reply to comment #7)
> You could limit it to the width of the controls underneath?

I'm not really sure if I understand your comment. Do you think limit the width in this way?
Comment 9 Ondrej Holy 2013-08-06 08:19:27 UTC 
Created attachment 250924 [details] [review]
add an explanation

Rebased to master.
Comment 10 Stef Walter 2013-08-14 13:06:29 UTC 
Comment on attachment 250924 [details] [review]
add an explanation

Looks good.