GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 628552
Crash in miUnionNonO, model_rows_inserted_cb at e-day-view.c line 951
Last modified: 2010-10-21 10:30:14 UTC
What were you doing when the application crashed? I just created a new meeting requestion (with Groupwise as the calendar backend) and sent it (not sure if it went through ok). I next clicked on the "Today" button to switch the calendar to the current day and it crashed. Distribution: openSUSE 11.3 (x86_64) Gnome Release: 2.30.0 (null) (SUSE) BugBuddy Version: 2.30.0 System: Linux 2.6.34-12-desktop #1 SMP PREEMPT 2010-06-29 02:39:08 +0200 x86_64 X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation X Vendor Release: 10800000 Selinux: No Accessibility: Disabled GTK+ Theme: Gilouche Icon Theme: Gilouche GTK+ Modules: canberra-gtk-module, gnomebreakpad Memory status: size: 857272320 vsize: 857272320 resident: 98418688 share: 30769152 rss: 98418688 rss_rlim: 18446744073709551615 CPU usage: start_time: 1283362470 rtime: 2974 utime: 2670 stime: 304 cutime:23 cstime: 4 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100 Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/evolution' [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread 0x7ff17aab6710 (LWP 5054)] [New Thread 0x7ff19a00a710 (LWP 26974)] [New Thread 0x7ff17ffff710 (LWP 26970)] [New Thread 0x7ff184ff9710 (LWP 26969)] [New Thread 0x7ff1857fa710 (LWP 26968)] [New Thread 0x7ff185ffb710 (LWP 26966)] [New Thread 0x7ff187fff710 (LWP 26962)] [New Thread 0x7ff18cd80710 (LWP 26960)] [New Thread 0x7ff18e9b5710 (LWP 26957)] [New Thread 0x7ff18f1b6710 (LWP 26956)] [New Thread 0x7ff18fe03710 (LWP 26955)] [New Thread 0x7ff190604710 (LWP 26954)] 0x00007ff1a97bbe7d in __libc_waitpid (pid=<value optimized out>, stat_loc=<value optimized out>, options=<value optimized out>) at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/waitpid.c:41 in ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/waitpid.c
+ Trace 223518
Thread 1 (Thread 0x7ff1aa6c3940 (LWP 26951))
Inferior 1 [process 26951] will be detached. Quit anyway? (y or n) [answered Y; input not from terminal] ---- Critical and fatal warnings logged during execution ---- ** GLib **: g_strchug: assertion `string != NULL' failed ** GLib **: g_strchomp: assertion `string != NULL' failed ** GdkPixbuf **: gdk_pixbuf_composite: assertion `dest_y >= 0 && dest_y + dest_height <= dest->height' failed ** GdkPixbuf **: gdk_pixbuf_composite: assertion `dest_y >= 0 && dest_y + dest_height <= dest->height' failed ** GdkPixbuf **: gdk_pixbuf_composite: assertion `dest_y >= 0 && dest_y + dest_height <= dest->height' failed ** GdkPixbuf **: gdk_pixbuf_composite: assertion `dest_y >= 0 && dest_y + dest_height <= dest->height' failed ----------- .xsession-errors (64 sec old) --------------------- (nautilus:4718): GdkPixbuf-CRITICAL **: gdk_pixbuf_format_get_name: assertion `format != NULL' failed (nautilus:4718): GdkPixbuf-CRITICAL **: gdk_pixbuf_format_get_name: assertion `format != NULL' failed (nautilus:4718): GdkPixbuf-CRITICAL **: gdk_pixbuf_format_get_name: assertion `format != NULL' failed (nautilus:4718): GdkPixbuf-CRITICAL **: gdk_pixbuf_format_get_name: assertion `format != NULL' failed (nautilus:4718): GdkPixbuf-CRITICAL **: gdk_pixbuf_format_get_name: assertion `format != NULL' failed (nautilus:4718): GdkPixbuf-CRITICAL **: gdk_pixbuf_format_get_name: assertion `format != NULL' failed (nautilus:4718): GdkPixbuf-CRITICAL **: gdk_pixbuf_format_get_name: assertion `format != NULL' failed (nautilus:4718): GdkPixbuf-CRITICAL **: gdk_pixbuf_format_get_name: assertion `format != NULL' failed --------------------------------------------------
possible dup of bug 621688
(In reply to comment #1) > possible dup of bug 621688 Yup, I agree. Seems like just another way how to trigger it.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 621688 ***