After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 619059 - crash in Evolution: Starting up evo!
crash in Evolution: Starting up evo!
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 612082
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: BugBuddyBugs
2.30.x (obsolete)
Other All
: Normal critical
: ---
Assigned To: Evolution Triage Team
Evolution QA team
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2010-05-19 07:16 UTC by Svante Signell
Modified: 2010-05-19 11:41 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.29/2.30



Description Svante Signell 2010-05-19 07:16:23 UTC
What were you doing when the application crashed?
Starting up evo!


Distribution: Debian squeeze/sid
Gnome Release: 2.30.0 2010-04-26 (Debian)
BugBuddy Version: 2.30.0

System: Linux 2.6.32-3-686 #1 SMP Thu Feb 25 06:14:20 UTC 2010 i686
X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation
X Vendor Release: 10706000
Selinux: No
Accessibility: Disabled
GTK+ Theme: Clearlooks
Icon Theme: gnome
GTK+ Modules: gnomebreakpad, canberra-gtk-module

Memory status: size: 244879360 vsize: 244879360 resident: 67321856 share: 23785472 rss: 67321856 rss_rlim: 18446744073709551615
CPU usage: start_time: 1274253294 rtime: 829 utime: 711 stime: 118 cutime:3 cstime: 6 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/evolution'

[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 0xaba3db70 (LWP 26570)]
[New Thread 0xae1feb70 (LWP 26545)]
[New Thread 0xaf391b70 (LWP 26538)]
[New Thread 0xafb92b70 (LWP 26537)]
[New Thread 0xb0bb9b70 (LWP 26535)]
[New Thread 0xb13bab70 (LWP 26534)]
[New Thread 0xb1bc0b70 (LWP 26533)]
[New Thread 0xb23c1b70 (LWP 26532)]
0xb78cd424 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

Thread 3 (Thread 0xae1feb70 (LWP 26545))

  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #1 __lll_lock_wait
    from /lib/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0
  • #2 _L_lock_881
    from /lib/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0
  • #3 pthread_mutex_lock
    from /lib/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0
  • #4 segv_redirect
    at main.c line 288
  • #5 <signal handler called>
  • #6 em_format_snoop_type
    at em-format.c line 2021
  • #7 em_format_part_as
    at em-format.c line 659
  • #8 em_format_part
    at em-format.c line 704
  • #9 emf_multipart_mixed
    at em-format.c line 1435
  • #10 em_format_part_as
    at em-format.c line 675
  • #11 em_format_part
    at em-format.c line 704
  • #12 efh_format_message
    at em-format-html.c line 2782
  • #13 efh_format_exec
    at em-format-html.c line 216
  • #14 mail_msg_proxy
    at mail-mt.c line 471
  • #15 g_thread_pool_thread_proxy
    at /build/buildd-glib2.0_2.24.1-1-i386-84Pp4V/glib2.0-2.24.1/glib/gthreadpool.c line 315
  • #16 g_thread_create_proxy
    at /build/buildd-glib2.0_2.24.1-1-i386-84Pp4V/glib2.0-2.24.1/glib/gthread.c line 1893
  • #17 start_thread
    from /lib/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0
  • #18 clone
    from /lib/i686/cmov/libc.so.6

	Inferior 1 [process 26530] will be detached.

Quit anyway? (y or n) [answered Y; input not from terminal]


----------- .xsession-errors (3096689 sec old) ---------------------
Error: Illegal entry in bfchar block in ToUnicode CMap
Error: Illegal entry in bfchar block in ToUnicode CMap
Error: Illegal entry in bfchar block in ToUnicode CMap
Error: Illegal entry in bfchar block in ToUnicode CMap
Error: Illegal entry in bfchar block in ToUnicode CMap
Error: Illegal entry in bfchar block in ToUnicode CMap
Error: Illegal entry in bfchar block in ToUnicode CMap
Error: Illegal entry in bfchar block in ToUnicode CMap
Error: Illegal entry in bfchar block in ToUnicode CMap
Error: Illegal entry in bfchar block in ToUnicode CMap
Error: Illegal entry in bfchar block in ToUnicode CMap
Error: Illegal entry in bfchar block in ToUnicode CMap
Error: Illegal entry in bfchar block in ToUnicode CMap
Error: Illegal entry in bfchar block in ToUnico
...Too much output, ignoring rest...
--------------------------------------------------
Comment 1 André Klapper 2010-05-19 11:41:51 UTC
Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 612082 ***