After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 618840 - gconf-dbus: Remove deprecated GLib symbol
gconf-dbus: Remove deprecated GLib symbol
Status: RESOLVED NOTGNOME
Product: gconf-editor
Classification: Applications
Component: general
unspecified
Other Linux
: Normal minor
: ---
Assigned To: Gconf Editor Maintainers
Gconf Editor Maintainers
Depends on: 560423
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2010-05-17 05:57 UTC by Gavin S
Modified: 2010-11-07 14:09 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---

Attachments
Diff of changes (3.78 KB, patch)
2010-05-17 16:25 UTC, Gavin S 		rejected Details | Review

Description Gavin S 2010-05-17 05:57:23 UTC 
Found openhatch.org and started looking for something to do. So I found gconf-dbus and ran the egrep command from http://live.gnome.org/GnomeGoals/RemoveDeprecatedSymbols/Glib on it and then went through and fixed what popped up. I got it to compile with the -DG_DISABLE_DEPRECATED flag and now I'm wondering where to go.

Also - when I ran the egrep command it found some of the dep funcs in the .svn directory, I assume I can ignore those.

Thanks
Comment 1 Cosimo Cecchi 2010-05-17 08:53:54 UTC 
If you have a patch, could you please attach it here?
Comment 2 Gavin S 2010-05-17 16:25:10 UTC 
Created attachment 161236 [details] [review]
Diff of changes

This is my first shot at this. Let me know how I did.
Comment 3 André Klapper 2010-06-27 10:16:20 UTC 
I have no idea what codebase this is about and what this patch is created against.

Looks like it might be for GConf instead of gconf-editor and might be a years-old checkout from svn instead of git. Can't find any of the places for the first changes in the current codebase and gave up to check the rest.

Gavin, please clarify.
Comment 4 Tobias Mueller 2010-11-07 12:04:26 UTC 
Gavin, Ping.

Cosimo, does the patch make sense to you?
Comment 5 Cosimo Cecchi 2010-11-07 12:26:52 UTC 
(In reply to comment #4)

> Cosimo, does the patch make sense to you?

This doesn't seem neither a patch against gconf-editor, nor one against the upstream GConf, so there's really nothing we could do here.
It might be a patch against gconf-dbus [1] instead, which would make this NOTGNOME.

[1] http://meego.gitorious.org/meego-os-base/gconf-dbus
Comment 6 Tobias Mueller 2010-11-07 14:08:37 UTC 
Thank. Closing as NOTGNOME as per comment #5. Gavin, please raise your issue upstream.