After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 613729 - "activities" menu should overlay desktop (instead of making the desktop shrink)
"activities" menu should overlay desktop (instead of making the desktop shrink)
Status: RESOLVED OBSOLETE
Product: gnome-shell
Classification: Core
Component: general
unspecified
Other Linux
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: gnome-shell-maint
gnome-shell-maint
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2010-03-23 18:58 UTC by Bernhard Koenig
Modified: 2011-02-10 00:37 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---



Description Bernhard Koenig 2010-03-23 18:58:41 UTC
There should be a mode where you can choose to have the "activities" menu overlay the desktop, i.e. it shouldn't make the desktop wallpaper shrink, maybe make it a somewhat transparent overlay over the wallpaper. The reason I think something like this is really necessary is that too many things are moving, popping up, popping down when using gnome-shell. Too many things zoom, re-adjust, compare with the side-bar there as well. This is annoying for many users and can easily cause headaches when you are not used to it.

So I really think there should be a "fewer-movements-and-more-stable-windows-mode" for gnome-shell. That's why I would propose something like an activities menu that doesn't make the wallpaper shrink but is just an overlay, kind of like a dock that pops up and hides without changing geometry of the rest of the screen.
Comment 1 Bernhard Koenig 2010-03-23 19:01:44 UTC
Also filed for Ubuntu at https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-shell/+bug/545324
Comment 2 Steven Garrity 2011-02-08 17:54:49 UTC
If I understand the report correctly, this change has already happens. The desktop is no longer scaled when moving into the Activities mode.
Comment 3 William Jon McCann 2011-02-10 00:37:52 UTC
Yeah, sounds obsolete.