After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 592489 - gtk_tree_view_column_get_cell_renderers implicitly converted to pointer
gtk_tree_view_column_get_cell_renderers implicitly converted to pointer
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 589105
Product: Gnumeric
Classification: Applications
Component: General
1.9.x
Other Linux
: Normal critical
: ---
Assigned To: Jody Goldberg
Jody Goldberg
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2009-08-20 18:27 UTC by Pedro Villavicencio
Modified: 2009-08-20 18:45 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---



Description Pedro Villavicencio 2009-08-20 18:27:30 UTC
this report has been filed here:

https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnumeric/+bug/402175

"Function `gtk_tree_view_column_get_cell_renderers' implicitly converted to pointer at ../../../src/dialogs/dialog-stf-preview.c:300

Our automated build log filter[1] detected the problem(s) above that will
likely cause your package to segfault on 64-bit architectures (where the
size of a pointer is greater than the size of an integer.)

This is often due to a missing function prototype definition.
For more information, see [2].

Since use of implicitly converted pointers is always (eventually
and/or itermittantly) fatal to the application, they are errors.
Please correct them for your next upload.

[1] http://people.debian.org/~dannf/check-implicit-pointer-functions
[2] http://wiki.debian.org/ImplicitPointerConversions"

Thanks,
Comment 1 Morten Welinder 2009-08-20 18:45:49 UTC
If you take away a function prototype that we use then this is
what happens.  In this case, the gtk developers did it for you.

I am not a great fan of automatically generated bug reports when
fail to mention basic things such as version numbers, in this case
for Gnumeric and GTK+.  If I didn't already see a (proper) report
for this, what would you expect me to do with this?  The current
version doesn't even use gtk_tree_view_column_get_cell_renderers.

Finally, "critical" does not mean "it happened to me".

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 589105 ***