After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 585963 - The auto-hide default settings of the gnome-panel are cumbersome, making the panel look sluggish and uncomfortable
The auto-hide default settings of the gnome-panel are cumbersome, making the ...
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: gnome-panel
Classification: Other
Component: panel
2.26.x
Other All
: Normal minor
: ---
Assigned To: Panel Maintainers
Panel Maintainers
: 347199 453743 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2009-06-16 10:07 UTC by Simon Ochsenreither
Modified: 2010-09-16 16:03 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.25/2.26


Attachments
Fixes a), b) and c) (2.41 KB, patch)
2009-06-16 10:17 UTC, Simon Ochsenreither
none Details | Review

Description Simon Ochsenreither 2009-06-16 10:07:55 UTC
To save space, I normally set Gnome's top panel to auto-hide.
But the bad defaults make it necessary that I have run gconf-editor to make the gnome-panel behave more responsive.

a) The hide/unhide animation is too slow.
=> Set "animation_speed" to "fast" by default.

b) When hidden, the panel still shows 6 pixel. This looks unprofessional when you have "expand" deactivated, because you can see a small bar of the wallpaper, which is confusing.
=> Set "auto_hide_size" from 6 to 1.

c) The hide/unhide delay is too large.
=> Reduce the "unhide_delay". (something between 0 and 100 should be ok.)
=> Reduce the "hide_delay". (something around 300 should be ok.)

d) Setting "auto_hide_size" to 0 does not work.
=> This should probably solved with a transparency.

Other information:
LP#387518
Comment 1 Simon Ochsenreither 2009-06-16 10:17:56 UTC
Created attachment 136711 [details] [review]
Fixes a), b) and c)
Comment 2 Vincent Untz 2009-06-18 07:07:02 UTC
This problem has been fixed in the development version. The fix will be available in the next major software release. Thank you for your bug report.
Comment 3 Vincent Untz 2009-06-18 07:15:22 UTC
*** Bug 347199 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 Vincent Untz 2009-06-18 07:17:19 UTC
*** Bug 453743 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 5 benwilson74 2010-09-16 16:03:04 UTC
Is there any chance of a fix for part d?