After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 581938 - crash in Evolution Mail and Calendar: Don't think I was doing ...
crash in Evolution Mail and Calendar: Don't think I was doing ...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 581442
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: BugBuddyBugs
2.24.x (obsolete)
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: Evolution Triage Team
Evolution QA team
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2009-05-08 22:01 UTC by Dwayne Bailey
Modified: 2009-05-09 03:56 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.23/2.24



Description Dwayne Bailey 2009-05-08 22:01:19 UTC
What were you doing when the application crashed?
Don't think I was doing anything



Distribution: Fedora release 10 (Cambridge)
Gnome Release: 2.24.3 2009-01-16 (Red Hat, Inc)
BugBuddy Version: 2.24.2

System: Linux 2.6.27.21-170.2.56.fc10.i686 #1 SMP Mon Mar 23 23:37:54 EDT 2009 i686
X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation
X Vendor Release: 10503000
Selinux: No
Accessibility: Enabled
GTK+ Theme: Nodoka
Icon Theme: Fedora

Memory status: size: 345681920 vsize: 345681920 resident: 147824640 share: 24084480 rss: 147824640 rss_rlim: 18446744073709551615
CPU usage: start_time: 1241808702 rtime: 17537 utime: 15553 stime: 1984 cutime:10 cstime: 29 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/evolution'

[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 0xb809a990 (LWP 3508)]
[New Thread 0xa79ffb90 (LWP 5791)]
[New Thread 0xa91feb90 (LWP 5790)]
[New Thread 0xadf79b90 (LWP 3707)]
[New Thread 0xa9bffb90 (LWP 3706)]
[New Thread 0xaede1b90 (LWP 3554)]
[New Thread 0xb0be4b90 (LWP 3551)]
[New Thread 0xb15e5b90 (LWP 3550)]
[New Thread 0xb1fe6b90 (LWP 3549)]
[New Thread 0xb6991b90 (LWP 3546)]
[New Thread 0xb33e8b90 (LWP 3545)]
[New Thread 0xb3de9b90 (LWP 3544)]
[New Thread 0xb53feb90 (LWP 3543)]
[New Thread 0xb5dffb90 (LWP 3541)]
[New Thread 0xb7397b90 (LWP 3539)]
[New Thread 0xb7d98b90 (LWP 3538)]
0x00479416 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

Thread 3 (Thread 0xa91feb90 (LWP 5790))

  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #1 __lll_lock_wait
    at ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386/i486/lowlevellock.S line 136
  • #2 _L_lock_89
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0
  • #3 __pthread_mutex_lock
    at pthread_mutex_lock.c line 86
  • #4 segv_redirect
    at main.c line 423
  • #5 <signal handler called>
  • #6 strcmp
    at ../sysdeps/i386/i686/strcmp.S line 40
  • #7 maildir_summary_sync
    at camel-maildir-summary.c line 770
  • #8 camel_local_summary_sync
    at camel-local-summary.c line 306
  • #9 local_sync
    at camel-local-folder.c line 515
  • #10 camel_folder_sync
    at camel-folder.c line 306
  • #11 transfer_messages_exec
    at mail-ops.c line 987
  • #12 mail_msg_proxy
    at mail-mt.c line 520
  • #13 g_thread_pool_thread_proxy
    at gthreadpool.c line 265
  • #14 g_thread_create_proxy
    at gthread.c line 635
  • #15 start_thread
    at pthread_create.c line 297
  • #16 clone
    at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386/clone.S line 130


----------- .xsession-errors (7 sec old) ---------------------
warning: the debug information found in "/usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/libgssapi_krb5.so.2.2.debug" does not match "/usr/lib/libgssapi_krb5.so.2" (CRC mismatch).
warning: the debug information found in "/usr/lib/debug//lib/libuuid.so.1.2.debug" does not match "/lib/libuuid.so.1" (CRC mismatch).
warning: the debug information found in "/usr/lib/debug/lib/libuuid.so.1.2.debug" does not match "/lib/libuuid.so.1" (CRC mismatch).
warning: the debug information found in "/usr/lib/debug//usr/lib/libkrb5support.so.0.1.debug" does not match "/usr/lib/libkrb5support.so.0" (CRC mismatch).
warning: the debug information found in "/usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/libkrb5support.so.0.1.debug" does not match "/usr/lib/libkrb5support.so.0" (CRC mismatch).
--------------------------------------------------
Comment 1 Fabio Durán Verdugo 2009-05-09 00:25:18 UTC
Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 569700 ***
Comment 2 Akhil Laddha 2009-05-09 03:56:03 UTC
Fabio, I don't see any similarity in traces , how is it duplicate of bug 569700 ?
Comment 3 Akhil Laddha 2009-05-09 03:56:54 UTC
Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 581442 ***