After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 579706 - GtkEntry instead of SexyIconEntry
GtkEntry instead of SexyIconEntry
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: gitg
Classification: Applications
Component: gui
git master
Other Linux
: Normal minor
: ---
Assigned To: gitg-maint
gitg-maint
: 588726 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks: 585385
 
 
Reported: 2009-04-21 10:51 UTC by Ignacio Casal Quinteiro (nacho)
Modified: 2010-01-11 09:13 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---

Attachments
sexyicon (31.49 KB, patch)
2009-04-21 10:52 UTC, Ignacio Casal Quinteiro (nacho) 		committed Details | Review
conditional compilation (4.47 KB, patch)
2009-05-18 01:10 UTC, Bruce Cowan 		none Details | Review

Description Ignacio Casal Quinteiro (nacho) 2009-04-21 10:51:42 UTC 
Path in the next comment.
Comment 1 Ignacio Casal Quinteiro (nacho) 2009-04-21 10:52:18 UTC 
Created attachment 133033 [details] [review]
sexyicon

This should fix the bug.
Comment 2 jessevdk@gmail.com 2009-04-21 11:07:20 UTC 
Kind reminder to myself, apply as soon as gtk+2.16 requirement is not inconvenient anymore.
Comment 3 Bruce Cowan 2009-05-18 01:10:57 UTC 
Created attachment 134843 [details] [review]
conditional compilation

This patch uses conditional compilation instead of having to hard depend on GTK 2.16.
Comment 4 Javier Jardón (IRC: jjardon) 2009-07-16 11:33:18 UTC 
*** Bug 588726 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 5 Javier Jardón (IRC: jjardon) 2009-10-13 17:57:46 UTC 
Could some gitg developer review Bruce patch?

This is one of the latest modules that still uses libsexy library ;)
See http://live.gnome.org/GnomeGoals/DropLibsexy and http://live.gnome.org/ProjectRidley
Comment 6 Javier Jardón (IRC: jjardon) 2010-01-11 04:50:33 UTC 
Hello Jesse,

as gitg uses GTK+ 2.16 now, could this be applied?
Comment 7 jessevdk@gmail.com 2010-01-11 09:13:00 UTC 
This problem has been fixed in the development version. The fix will be available in the next major software release. Thank you for your bug report.