After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 579704 - cannot move tracks around in large static playlist
cannot move tracks around in large static playlist
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 579137
Product: rhythmbox
Classification: Other
Component: User Interface
0.12.x
Other All
: Normal minor
: ---
Assigned To: RhythmBox Maintainers
RhythmBox Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2009-04-21 10:47 UTC by Hew McLachlan
Modified: 2009-04-21 10:49 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---



Description Hew McLachlan 2009-04-21 10:47:51 UTC
Please describe the problem:
I tried manually sorting some tracks from the bottom of a large static playlist, but as soon as I clicked and dragged them, the playlist instantly scrolled near the top. This happens for any track/s in a large (300+) static playlist that aren't already near the top. I am not moving the mouse near the borders which would normally cause slow scrolling. Once at the top of the playlist, it's impossible to scroll back down while holding the songs. This is a regression as I could previously move tracks without this problem.

Steps to reproduce:
Click and drag (don't release) any track/s in a large (300+) static playlist

Actual results:
The playlist instantly scrolls near the top.

Expected results:
The playlist doesn't scroll unless I move my cursor to the edges of the playlist area.

Does this happen every time?
Yes.

Other information:
From https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/364168

DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04
Package: rhythmbox 0.12.0-0ubuntu4
Comment 1 Jonathan Matthew 2009-04-21 10:49:07 UTC
Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 579137 ***