After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 551027 - gedit's embedded terminal: wrong gconf key
gedit's embedded terminal: wrong gconf key
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: gedit-plugins
Classification: Other
Component: General
2.22.x
Other All
: Normal minor
: ---
Assigned To: Gedit maintainers
Gedit maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2008-09-05 16:51 UTC by Kurt Litsch
Modified: 2019-03-23 20:46 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.1/2.2


Attachments
corrects the gconf key for font name in gedit's embedded terminal (4.38 KB, patch)
2008-09-05 16:54 UTC, Kurt Litsch
committed Details | Review

Description Kurt Litsch 2008-09-05 16:51:39 UTC
Please describe the problem:
Binary package hint: gedit-plugins

Embedded Terminal Plugin already try to comply Gnome Terminal style,
but fails takin' wrong gconf key (about font name).

"/desktop/gnome/interface/monospace_font" does not exist,
should instead use:
"/desktop/gnome/interface/monospace_font_name".

(As taken from https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gedit-plugins/+bug/155327)

Steps to reproduce:


Actual results:


Expected results:


Does this happen every time?


Other information:
PATCH: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17292095/gedit-plugins.debdiff

(Also listed on the LP site above)
Comment 1 Kurt Litsch 2008-09-05 16:54:28 UTC
Created attachment 118113 [details] [review]
corrects the gconf key for font name in gedit's embedded terminal
Comment 2 Paolo Borelli 2008-09-05 17:25:07 UTC
Patch looks good. I wonder if the old gconf key used to exist... in that case we should probably look for the new key and if it is not set check also the old key.
Comment 3 Christian Persch 2008-09-07 17:20:27 UTC
The other gconf key was never used by g-t afaict. So you shouldn't look for it (also esp. since g-t doesn't do that).
Comment 4 Paolo Borelli 2008-09-08 07:23:59 UTC
Thanks for the clarification (Christian) and for the patch (Kurt).

Fixed in svn.