After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 539958 - some icons don't follow zoom settings
some icons don't follow zoom settings
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: nautilus
Classification: Core
Component: Views: Icon View
3.8.x
Other Linux
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: Nautilus Maintainers
Nautilus Maintainers
: 692760 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2008-06-24 14:04 UTC by Sebastien Bacher
Modified: 2016-12-11 10:09 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.23/2.24


Description Sebastien Bacher 2008-06-24 14:04:41 UTC 
the bug has been opened on https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/236207

"This is a fresh install of Ubuntu 8.10 on a Dell Latitude D830. I am using one of the default included themes, Mist, however this problem exists for any default them I select.

As you can see from the included screen shoot, I have the icons sizes configured to show at 75% and the icons for the web link and the CHM file don't appear to follow the sizing suggestion. The only thing I have done after the install is change the icon zoom preference.

http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14854294/icons.png"
Comment 1 António Fernandes 2013-06-01 18:34:02 UTC 
*** Bug 692760 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 2 António Fernandes 2013-06-01 18:35:03 UTC 
Still valid.

See the attachments on bug 692760 for a test case.
Comment 3 Alexandre Franke 2016-12-11 10:09:22 UTC 
The icon view (layout, spacing and all that stuff) has been reworked since then. I downloaded the files in bug 692760 and tried. I can confirm that this now works as it should.

Side note for António: age shouldn't be the only criteria to select which bug to close as duplicate of the other. You should keep the "best" report open. In this case the other report had what was needed to reproduce, so you should have left the other one open and close this one. That would have made it easier for me, years later, to try to reproduce.