GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 539196
crash in Open Folder: openning remote folder o...
Last modified: 2008-06-19 22:24:32 UTC
Version: 2.20.0 What were you doing when the application crashed? openning remote folder on windows xp system with samba Distribution: Debian lenny/sid Gnome Release: 2.22.2 2008-05-29 (Debian) BugBuddy Version: 2.22.0 System: Linux 2.6.24-1-686 #1 SMP Thu May 8 02:16:39 UTC 2008 i686 X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation X Vendor Release: 10400090 Selinux: No Accessibility: Disabled GTK+ Theme: Clearlooks Icon Theme: gnome Memory status: size: 775720960 vsize: 775720960 resident: 69533696 share: 8970240 rss: 69533696 rss_rlim: 4294967295 CPU usage: start_time: 1211950120 rtime: 149308 utime: 141821 stime: 7487 cutime:238300 cstime: 25822 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100 Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/nautilus' (no debugging symbols found) Using host libthread_db library "/lib/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1". (no debugging symbols found) [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread 0xb6c33720 (LWP 4237)] [New Thread 0xb07c0b90 (LWP 29058)] (no debugging symbols found) 0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
+ Trace 200884
Thread 1 (Thread 0xb6c33720 (LWP 4237))
----------- .xsession-errors (1472955 sec old) --------------------- (rhythmbox:28636): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_hash_table_insert_internal: assertion `hash_table->ref_count > 0' failed (rhythmbox:28636): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_hash_table_insert_internal: assertion `hash_table->ref_count > 0' failed (rhythmbox:28636): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_hash_table_insert_internal: assertion `hash_table->ref_count > 0' failed (rhythmbox:28636): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_hash_table_insert_internal: assertion `hash_table->ref_count > 0' failed (rhythmbox:28636): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_hash_table_insert_internal: assertion `hash_table->ref_count > 0' failed (rhythmbox:28636): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_hash_table_insert_internal: assertion `hash_table->ref_count > 0' failed (rhythmbox:28636): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_hash_table_insert_internal: assertion `hash_table->ref_count > 0' failed ...Too much output, ignoring rest... --------------------------------------------------
Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 522534 ***