GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 537749
crash in Open Folder: Tried to access a samba ...
Last modified: 2008-06-11 11:13:31 UTC
Version: 2.20.0 What were you doing when the application crashed? Tried to access a samba share with nautilus. Directory was smb://1.2.3.4/data/temp/ Distribution: Debian lenny/sid Gnome Release: 2.22.2 2008-05-29 (Debian) BugBuddy Version: 2.22.0 System: Linux 2.6.25-2-686 #1 SMP Tue May 27 15:38:35 UTC 2008 i686 X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation X Vendor Release: 10400090 Selinux: No Accessibility: Disabled GTK+ Theme: DebianRed Icon Theme: Mist Memory status: size: 62533632 vsize: 62533632 resident: 28913664 share: 15667200 rss: 28913664 rss_rlim: 4294967295 CPU usage: start_time: 1213174751 rtime: 800 utime: 742 stime: 58 cutime:0 cstime: 0 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100 Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/nautilus' [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread 0xb6bd4720 (LWP 13216)] 0xb7fb3424 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
+ Trace 200113
Thread 1 (Thread 0xb6bd4720 (LWP 13216))
----------- .xsession-errors --------------------- Initializing gnome-mount extension ** (nautilus:13121): WARNING **: No description found for mime type "x-directory/smb-share" (file is "data"), please tell the gnome-vfs mailing list. Cannot access memory at address 0x0 Cannot access memory at address 0x0 Initializing gnome-mount extension ** (nautilus:13182): WARNING **: No description found for mime type "x-directory/smb-share" (file is "backup"), please tell the gnome-vfs mailing list. Cannot access memory at address 0x0 Cannot access memory at address 0x0 Initializing gnome-mount extension ** (nautilus:13216): WARNING **: No description found for mime type "x-directory/smb-share" (file is "data"), please tell the gnome-vfs mailing list. Cannot access memory at address 0x0 Cannot access memory at address 0x0 --------------------------------------------------
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but we are happy to tell you that the problem has already been fixed. It should be solved in the next software version. You may want to check for a software upgrade. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 522534 ***