After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 532525 - Crash on adding accounts
Crash on adding accounts
Status: RESOLVED NOTGNOME
Product: ekiga
Classification: Applications
Component: general
2.0.x
Other All
: Normal critical
: ---
Assigned To: Ekiga maintainers
Ekiga maintainers
: 516215 533629 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2008-05-10 19:43 UTC by Aidan Delaney
Modified: 2008-05-18 09:43 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.21/2.22



Description Aidan Delaney 2008-05-10 19:43:17 UTC
Steps to reproduce:
1. On Fedora 9, with selinux running (that selinux is enabled may be a red herring)
2. Use the accounts dialog add an account
3. Note that on clicking "ok" the application crashes


Stack trace:
An strace provides the following 
   1.      socket(PF_INET, SOCK_DGRAM, IPPROTO_IP) = 47
   2.      ioctl(47, FIONBIO, [1])                 = 0
   3.      fcntl64(47, F_SETFD, FD_CLOEXEC)        = 0
   4.      ioctl(47, SIOCGIFCONF, {96, {{"lo", {AF_INET, inet_addr("127.0.0.1")}}, {"wlan0", {AF_INET, inet_addr("192.168.1.106")}}, {"virbr0", {AF_INET, inet_addr("192.168.122.1")}}}}) = 0
   5.      ioctl(47, SIOCGIFFLAGS, {ifr_name="lo", ifr_flags=IFF_UP|IFF_LOOPBACK|IFF_RUNNING}) = 0
   6.      ioctl(47, SIOCGIFHWADDR, {ifr_name="lo", ifr_hwaddr=00:00:00:00:00:00}) = 0
   7.      ioctl(47, SIOCGIFADDR, {ifr_name="lo", ifr_addr={AF_INET, inet_addr("127.0.0.1")}}) = 0
   8.      ioctl(47, SIOCGIFNETMASK, {ifr_name="lo", ifr_netmask={AF_INET, inet_addr("255.0.0.0")}}) = 0
   9.      ioctl(47, SIOCGIFFLAGS, {ifr_name="wlan0", ifr_flags=IFF_UP|IFF_BROADCAST|IFF_RUNNING|IFF_MULTICAST}) = 0
  10.      ioctl(47, SIOCGIFHWADDR, {ifr_name="wlan0", ifr_hwaddr=00:18:de:72:01:af}) = 0
  11.      ioctl(47, SIOCGIFADDR, {ifr_name="wlan0", ifr_addr={AF_INET, inet_addr("192.168.1.106")}}) = 0
  12.      ioctl(47, SIOCGIFNETMASK, {ifr_name="wlan0", ifr_netmask={AF_INET, inet_addr("255.255.255.0")}}) = 0
  13.      ioctl(47, SIOCGIFFLAGS, {ifr_name="virbr0", ifr_flags=IFF_UP|IFF_BROADCAST|IFF_RUNNING|IFF_MULTICAST}) = 0
  14.      ioctl(47, SIOCGIFHWADDR, {ifr_name="virbr0", ifr_hwaddr=da:5a:8b:1e:97:6f}) = 0
  15.      ioctl(47, SIOCGIFADDR, {ifr_name="virbr0", ifr_addr={AF_INET, inet_addr("192.168.122.1")}}) = 0
  16.      ioctl(47, SIOCGIFNETMASK, {ifr_name="virbr0", ifr_netmask={AF_INET, inet_addr("255.255.255.0")}}) = 0
  17.      shutdown(47, 2 /* send and receive */)  = -1 ENOTCONN (Transport endpoint is not connected)
  18.      close(47)                               = 0
  19.      --- SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault) @ 0 (0) ---

Other information:
I manually added an account to the gconf keys, after doing that I get a crash with the following output
bash-3.2$ ekiga
6ec4f46d-435c-80bd-43b7c337-4bbbb32c is dumped

This may be a Fedora specific bug.

Will provide a gdb stacktrace later.
Comment 1 Aidan Delaney 2008-05-10 19:48:58 UTC
GDB stacktrace (from bug-buddy):

Distribution: Fedora release 9 (Sulphur)
Gnome Release: 2.22.1 2008-04-30 (Red Hat, Inc)
BugBuddy Version: 2.22.0

System: Linux 2.6.25-14.fc9.i686 #1 SMP Thu May 1 06:28:41 EDT 2008 i686
X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation
X Vendor Release: 10499901
Selinux: Permissive
Accessibility: Disabled
GTK+ Theme: Nodoka
Icon Theme: Fedora

Memory status: size: 105746432 vsize: 105746432 resident: 31010816 share: 20209664 rss: 31010816 rss_rlim: 4294967295
CPU usage: start_time: 1210448763 rtime: 125 utime: 109 stime: 16 cutime:0 cstime: 0 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/ekiga'

[?1034h[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 0xb7eed730 (LWP 4275)]
[New Thread 0xb4c20b90 (LWP 4287)]
[New Thread 0xb4c61b90 (LWP 4286)]
[New Thread 0xb4cb9b90 (LWP 4284)]
[New Thread 0xb56bab90 (LWP 4282)]
[New Thread 0xb7a82b90 (LWP 4279)]
[New Thread 0xb7ac3b90 (LWP 4278)]
0x00110416 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

Thread 1 (Thread 0xb7eed730 (LWP 4275))

  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #1 waitpid
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0
  • #2 g_spawn_sync
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #3 g_spawn_command_line_sync
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #4 ??
    from /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/modules/libgnomebreakpad.so
  • #5 ??
    from /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/modules/libgnomebreakpad.so
  • #6 google_breakpad::ExceptionHandler::InternalWriteMinidump
    from /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/modules/libgnomebreakpad.so
  • #7 google_breakpad::ExceptionHandler::HandleException
    from /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/modules/libgnomebreakpad.so
  • #8 <signal handler called>
  • #9 PContainer::PContainer
    from /usr/lib/libpt_linux_x86_r.so.1.10.10
  • #10 PAbstractArray::PAbstractArray
    from /usr/lib/libpt_linux_x86_r.so.1.10.10
  • #11 PString::PString
    from /usr/lib/libpt_linux_x86_r.so.1.10.10
  • #12 OpalGloballyUniqueID::OpalGloballyUniqueID
    from /usr/lib/libopal_linux_x86_r.so.2.2
  • #13 gm_account_new
    at gui/accounts.cpp line 1021
  • #14 gm_aw_edit_account_dialog_run
    at gui/accounts.cpp line 657
  • #15 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #16 g_closure_invoke
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #17 ??
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #18 g_signal_emit_valist
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #19 g_signal_emit
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #20 gtk_button_clicked
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #21 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #22 ??
  • #23 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #24 ??
  • #25 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall


Comment 2 Aidan Delaney 2008-05-12 12:20:56 UTC
This is a downstream packaging issue

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441202
Comment 3 Damien Sandras 2008-05-12 20:14:39 UTC
*** Bug 516215 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 Damien Sandras 2008-05-12 20:15:05 UTC
Thanks for confirming it was a packaging issue!
Comment 5 Damien Sandras 2008-05-18 09:43:46 UTC
*** Bug 533629 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***