After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 528771 - crash in Evolution Mail: I was in the Evolution p...
crash in Evolution Mail: I was in the Evolution p...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 324168
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: BugBuddyBugs
2.12.x (obsolete)
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: Evolution Triage Team
Evolution QA team
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2008-04-18 16:07 UTC by philippe
Modified: 2008-05-13 11:45 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.21/2.22


Description philippe 2008-04-18 16:07:55 UTC 
What were you doing when the application crashed?
I was in the Evolution preferences, and I unselected an account name.


Distribution: Debian lenny/sid
Gnome Release: 2.22.0 2008-03-14 (Debian)
BugBuddy Version: 2.22.0

System: Linux 2.6.24-1-amd64 #1 SMP Thu Mar 27 16:52:38 UTC 2008 x86_64
X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation
X Vendor Release: 10300000
Selinux: No
Accessibility: Disabled
GTK+ Theme: SphereCrystal
Icon Theme: glass-icons

Memory status: size: 630730752 vsize: 630730752 resident: 58806272 share: 25042944 rss: 58806272 rss_rlim: 18446744073709551615
CPU usage: start_time: 1208530974 rtime: 1726 utime: 1626 stime: 100 cutime:2 cstime: 7 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/evolution'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 0x2b5d8a3f5ce0 (LWP 10302)]
[New Thread 0x4604c950 (LWP 10333)]
[New Thread 0x4600b950 (LWP 10331)]
[New Thread 0x44808950 (LWP 10329)]
[New Thread 0x4580a950 (LWP 10326)]
[New Thread 0x45009950 (LWP 10325)]
[New Thread 0x44007950 (LWP 10319)]
[New Thread 0x43806950 (LWP 10318)]
[New Thread 0x43005950 (LWP 10317)]
[New Thread 0x42804950 (LWP 10316)]
[New Thread 0x42003950 (LWP 10312)]
[New Thread 0x41001950 (LWP 10308)]
[New Thread 0x40800950 (LWP 10306)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0x00002b5d7f9feedf in waitpid () from /lib/libpthread.so.0

+ Trace 195556

Thread 1 (Thread 0x2b5d8a3f5ce0 (LWP 10302))

  • #0 waitpid
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0
  • #1 g_spawn_sync
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #2 g_spawn_command_line_sync
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #3 ??
    from /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/modules/libgnomebreakpad.so
  • #4 <signal handler called>
  • #5 camel_folder_summary_content_info_free
    from /usr/lib/libcamel-provider-1.2.so.10
  • #6 camel_message_info_free
    from /usr/lib/libcamel-provider-1.2.so.10
  • #7 camel_folder_summary_clear
    from /usr/lib/libcamel-provider-1.2.so.10
  • #8 ??
    from /usr/lib/libcamel-provider-1.2.so.10
  • #9 camel_object_unref
    from /usr/lib/libcamel-1.2.so.10
  • #10 ??
    from /usr/lib/libcamel-provider-1.2.so.10
  • #11 camel_object_unref
    from /usr/lib/libcamel-1.2.so.10
  • #12 ??
    from /usr/lib/evolution/2.12/components/libevolution-mail.so
  • #13 mail_component_remove_store
    from /usr/lib/evolution/2.12/components/libevolution-mail.so
  • #14 mail_component_remove_store_by_uri
    from /usr/lib/evolution/2.12/components/libevolution-mail.so
  • #15 ??
    from /usr/lib/evolution/2.12/components/libevolution-mail.so
  • #16 ??
    from /usr/lib/evolution/2.12/components/libevolution-mail.so
  • #17 g_closure_invoke
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #18 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #19 g_signal_emit_valist
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #20 g_signal_emit
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #21 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #22 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #23 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #24 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #25 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #26 g_closure_invoke
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #27 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #28 g_signal_emit_valist
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #29 g_signal_emit
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #30 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #31 gtk_propagate_event
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #32 gtk_main_do_event
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #33 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #34 g_main_context_dispatch
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #35 ??
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #36 g_main_loop_run
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #37 bonobo_main
    from /usr/lib/libbonobo-2.so.0
  • #38 ??
  • #39 __libc_start_main
    from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #40 ??
  • #41 ??
  • #42 ??
  • #0 waitpid
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0 


----------- .xsession-errors (11301 sec old) ---------------------
ALSA lib ../../../src/pcm/pcm_dmix.c:996:(snd_pcm_dmix_open) unable to open slave
ALSA lib ../../../src/pcm/pcm_dmix.c:996:(snd_pcm_dmix_open) unable to open slave
ALSA lib ../../../src/pcm/pcm_dmix.c:996:(snd_pcm_dmix_open) unable to open slave
ALSA lib ../../../src/pcm/pcm_dmix.c:996:(snd_pcm_dmix_open) unable to open slave
ALSA lib ../../../src/pcm/pcm_dmix.c:996:(snd_pcm_dmix_open) unable to open slave
ALSA lib ../../../src/pcm/pcm_dmix.c:996:(snd_pcm_dmix_open) unable to open slave
ALSA lib ../../../src/pcm/pcm_dmix.c:996:(snd_pcm_dmix_open) unable to open slave
ALSA lib ../../../src/pcm/pcm_dmix.c:996:(snd_pcm_dmix_open) unable to open slave
ALSA lib ../../../src/pcm/pcm_dmix.c:996:(snd_pcm_dmix_open) unable to open slave
ALSA lib ../../../src/pcm/pcm_dmix.c:996:(snd_pcm_dmix_open) unable to open slave
ALSA lib ../../../src/pcm/pcm_dmix.c:996:(snd_pcm_dmix_open) unable to open slave
ALSA lib ../../../src/pcm/pcm_dmix.c:996:(snd_pcm_dmix_open) unable to open slave
ALSA lib ../../../src/pcm/pcm_dmix.c:996:(snd_pcm_dmix_open) unable to open slave
ALSA lib ../../../src/pcm/pcm_dmix.c:996:(snd_pcm_dmix_open) 
...Too much output, ignoring rest...
--------------------------------------------------
Comment 1 Akhil Laddha 2008-05-13 11:45:12 UTC 
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but
we are happy to tell you that the problem has already been fixed. It should be
solved in the next software version. You may want to check for a software
upgrade.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 324168 ***