After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 525439 - With Evolution message header list, navigation "by cell" speaks "unselected".
With Evolution message header list, navigation "by cell" speaks "unselected".
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 523235
Product: orca
Classification: Applications
Component: general
unspecified
Other Linux
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: Orca Maintainers
Orca Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2008-03-31 21:25 UTC by Rich Burridge
Modified: 2008-04-01 01:18 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---

Attachments
Orca debug log generated whilst testing this problem. (40.58 KB, text/plain)
2008-03-31 21:29 UTC, Rich Burridge 		Details

Description Rich Burridge 2008-03-31 21:25:13 UTC 
Steps to reproduce.

1/ Start Orca
2/ Start Evolution
3/ Navigate to the message header list.
4/ Press Insert-F11 to speak table cells "by cell" rather than "by row".
5/ Move Left or Right on a message header.

Orca speaks "not selected" after each movement.

Orca debug log to be attached.
Comment 1 Rich Burridge 2008-03-31 21:29:06 UTC 
Created attachment 108371 [details]
Orca debug log generated whilst testing this problem.

If you look at line 800, you'll see a "focus:" event:

OBJECT EVENT: focus:                                   detail=(0,0)
    app.name='evolution' name='Wii for surgeons' role='table cell' state='enabled focusable focused selectable sensitive showing transient visible' relations=''

This is telling us that that table cell is not selected, whereas
visually it appears it is (it's got a blue background).

We'll need to see if we can work around this.

Mike, I presume as the Evolution message header list is read-only,
the desired behavior here is to not speak the selected state (or
not) of the individual table cells, correct?
Comment 2 Joanmarie Diggs (IRC: joanie) 2008-04-01 01:11:39 UTC 
Rich, is this a duplicate of bug 523235?
Comment 3 Rich Burridge 2008-04-01 01:18:43 UTC 
> Rich, is this a duplicate of bug 523235?

Yes it is. Thanks Joanie.

Mike, we really need you to comment on bug #523235
so that a fix can be checked in (there are two potential
patches there).

Thanks.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 523235 ***