Bug 520500 – crash in Tasks: just clicking to open a ...

After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.

Bug 520500 - crash in Tasks: just clicking to open a ...


Summary:	crash in Tasks: just clicking to open a ...


Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 455077

Product:	evolution
Classification:	Applications
Component:	Tasks
Version:	unspecified
Hardware:	Other All

Importance:	High critical
Target Milestone:	---
Assigned To:	evolution-calendar-maintainers
QA Contact:	Evolution QA team

URL:
Whiteboard:

Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2008-03-05 11:40 UTC by miranda
Modified:	2008-03-15 20:42 UTC

See Also:
GNOME target:	---
GNOME version:	2.17/2.18

Description miranda 2008-03-05 11:40:31 UTC

Version: 2.10

What were you doing when the application crashed?
just clicking to open a message


Distribution: Fedora release 7 (Moonshine)
Gnome Release: 2.18.3 2007-11-13 (Red Hat, Inc)
BugBuddy Version: 2.18.0

System: Linux 2.6.23.1-21.fc7 #1 SMP Thu Nov 1 21:09:24 EDT 2007 i686
X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation
X Vendor Release: 10300000
Selinux: No
Accessibility: Disabled
GTK+ Theme: Clearlooks
Icon Theme: Fedora

Memory status: size: 141398016 vsize: 141398016 resident: 55652352 share: 33644544 rss: 55652352 rss_rlim: 4294967295
CPU usage: start_time: 1204716772 rtime: 837 utime: 720 stime: 117 cutime:63 cstime: 37 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/evolution'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1208686880 (LWP 22561)]
[New Thread -1228731504 (LWP 22813)]
[New Thread -1262105712 (LWP 22812)]
[New Thread -1291916400 (LWP 22583)]
[New Thread -1250956400 (LWP 22570)]
[New Thread -1261839472 (LWP 22568)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0x00110402 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

+ Trace 191374

Thread 1 (Thread -1208686880 (LWP 22561))

#0 __kernel_vsyscall
#1 waitpid
from /lib/libpthread.so.0
#2 ??
from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
#3 ??
#4 <signal handler called>
#5 ??
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#6 ??
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#7 ??
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#8 g_slice_free_chain_with_offset
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#9 g_slist_free
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#10 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
#11 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
#12 html_object_destroy
from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
#13 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
#14 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
#15 html_object_destroy
from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
#16 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
#17 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
#18 html_object_destroy
from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
#19 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
#20 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
#21 html_object_destroy
from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
#22 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
#23 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
#24 html_object_destroy
from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
#25 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
#26 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
#27 html_object_destroy
from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
#28 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
#29 g_object_unref
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#30 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
#31 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#32 ??
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#33 g_closure_invoke
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#34 ??
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#35 g_signal_emit_valist
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#36 g_signal_emit
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#37 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#38 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#39 g_object_run_dispose
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#40 gtk_object_destroy
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#41 gtk_widget_destroy
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#42 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#43 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#44 gtk_container_foreach
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#45 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#46 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#47 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#48 ??
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#49 g_closure_invoke
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#50 ??
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#51 g_signal_emit_valist
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#52 g_signal_emit
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#53 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#54 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#55 g_object_unref
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#56 ??
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#57 g_value_unset
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#58 g_signal_emit_valist
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#59 g_signal_emit
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#60 gtk_container_remove
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#61 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
#62 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
#63 html_object_destroy
from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
#64 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
#65 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
#66 html_object_destroy
from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
#67 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
#68 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
#69 html_object_destroy
from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
#70 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
#71 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
#72 html_object_destroy
from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
#73 html_engine_parse
from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
#74 gtk_html_begin_full
from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
#75 ??
from /usr/lib/evolution/2.10/components/libevolution-mail.so
#76 ??
from /usr/lib/evolution/2.10/components/libevolution-mail.so
#77 ??
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#78 g_main_context_dispatch
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#79 ??
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#80 g_main_loop_run
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#81 bonobo_main
from /usr/lib/libbonobo-2.so.0
#82 main
#0 __kernel_vsyscall

Comment 1 Kandepu Prasad 2008-03-15 20:42:06 UTC

Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into
our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you
find.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 455077 ***