After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 517481 - crash in Tasks: Reading email
crash in Tasks: Reading email
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 447591
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: BugBuddyBugs
unspecified
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: Evolution Triage Team
Evolution QA team
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2008-02-19 16:28 UTC by jim.welch
Modified: 2008-02-20 06:44 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.17/2.18



Description jim.welch 2008-02-19 16:28:34 UTC
Version: 2.10

What were you doing when the application crashed?
Reading email


Distribution: Fedora release 7 (Moonshine)
Gnome Release: 2.18.3 2007-11-13 (Red Hat, Inc)
BugBuddy Version: 2.18.0

System: Linux 2.6.23.15-80.fc7 #1 SMP Sun Feb 10 16:52:18 EST 2008 x86_64
X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation
X Vendor Release: 10300000
Selinux: No
Accessibility: Disabled
GTK+ Theme: Clearlooks
Icon Theme: Fedora

Memory status: size: 646746112 vsize: 646746112 resident: 68653056 share: 41979904 rss: 68653056 rss_rlim: 18446744073709551615
CPU usage: start_time: 1203434227 rtime: 1293 utime: 1191 stime: 102 cutime:39 cstime: 12 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/evolution'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib64/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 46912496444784 (LWP 11604)]
[New Thread 1105209680 (LWP 11647)]
[New Thread 1126455632 (LWP 11619)]
[New Thread 1147169104 (LWP 11616)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0x0000003c0fe0d97f in waitpid () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0

Thread 1 (Thread 46912496444784 (LWP 11604))

  • #0 waitpid
    from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
  • #1 ??
    from /usr/lib64/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #2 <signal handler called>
  • #3 ??
    from /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #4 ??
    from /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #5 ??
    from /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #6 g_slice_free_chain_with_offset
    from /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #7 ??
    from /usr/lib64/libbonoboui-2.so.0
  • #8 ??
    from /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #9 bonobo_ui_engine_dispose
    from /usr/lib64/libbonoboui-2.so.0
  • #10 ??
    from /usr/lib64/libbonoboui-2.so.0
  • #11 g_object_run_dispose
    from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #12 gtk_main_do_event
    from /usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #13 ??
    from /usr/lib64/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #14 g_main_context_dispatch
    from /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #15 ??
    from /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #16 g_main_loop_run
    from /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #17 bonobo_main
    from /usr/lib64/libbonobo-2.so.0
  • #18 main
  • #0 waitpid
    from /lib64/libpthread.so.0


----------- .xsession-errors (85456 sec old) ---------------------
Xlib:  extension "SHAPE" missing on display ":0.0".
Xlib:  extension "SHAPE" missing on display ":0.0".
Xlib:  extension "SHAPE" missing on display ":0.0".
Xlib:  extension "SHAPE" missing on display ":0.0".
Xlib:  extension "SHAPE" missing on display ":0.0".
Xlib:  extension "SHAPE" missing on display ":0.0".
Xlib:  extension "SHAPE" missing on display ":0.0".
Xlib:  extension "SHAPE" missing on display ":0.0".
Xlib:  extension "SHAPE" missing on display ":0.0".
Xlib:  extension "SHAPE" missing on display ":0.0".
Xlib:  extension "SHAPE" missing on display ":0.0".
Xlib:  extension "SHAPE" missing on display ":0.0".
Xlib:  extension "SHAPE" missing on display ":0.0".
...Too much output, ignoring rest...
--------------------------------------------------
Comment 1 Akhil Laddha 2008-02-20 06:41:46 UTC
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but
the maintainers need more information to fix the bug. Could you please answer
the questions in the other report in order to help the developers?


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 447591 ***
Comment 2 Akhil Laddha 2008-02-20 06:44:42 UTC
Sorry for spam but i mentioned wrong comment in previous one

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but
we are happy to tell you that the problem has already been fixed. It should be
solved in the next software version. You may want to check for a software
upgrade.