GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 510037
crash in Open Folder: Attempting to enter an a...
Last modified: 2008-01-17 01:11:01 UTC
Version: 2.18.3 What were you doing when the application crashed? Attempting to enter an address in Nautilus Distribution: Debian lenny/sid Gnome Release: 2.20.2 2007-11-29 (Debian) BugBuddy Version: 2.20.1 System: Linux 2.6.22-3-amd64 #1 SMP Sun Nov 4 18:18:09 UTC 2007 x86_64 X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation X Vendor Release: 10300000 Selinux: No Accessibility: Disabled GTK+ Theme: Clearlooks Icon Theme: gnome Memory status: size: 389120000 vsize: 389120000 resident: 31186944 share: 17723392 rss: 31186944 rss_rlim: 18446744073709551615 CPU usage: start_time: 1200529799 rtime: 216 utime: 196 stime: 20 cutime:0 cstime: 0 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100 Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/nautilus' (no debugging symbols found) Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1". (no debugging symbols found) [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread 0x2b4d6f109540 (LWP 5880)] (no debugging symbols found) 0x00002b4d6859234f in waitpid () from /lib/libpthread.so.0
+ Trace 185632
Thread 1 (Thread 0x2b4d6f109540 (LWP 5880))
----------- .xsession-errors --------------------- ** Message: drive = 0 ** Message: volume = 0 ** Message: drive = 0 ** Message: volume = 0 ** Message: drive = 0 ** Message: volume = 0 (PySwitcher.py:4085): Wnck-CRITICAL **: update_client_list: assertion `reentrancy_guard == 0' failed (PySwitcher.py:4085): Wnck-CRITICAL **: update_client_list: assertion `reentrancy_guard == 0' failed Gtk-ERROR **: file /build/buildd/gtk+2.0-2.12.1/gtk/gtkliststore.c: line 1677 (gtk_list_store_compare_func): assertion failed: (VALID_ITER (&iter_b, list_store)) aborting... (PySwitcher.py:4085): Wnck-CRITICAL **: update_client_list: assertion `reentrancy_guard == 0' failed --------------------------------------------------
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but we are happy to tell you that the problem has already been fixed. It should be solved in the next software version. You may want to check for a software upgrade. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 440988 ***