After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 509897 - crash in Evolution:
crash in Evolution:
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 431459
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: general
2.10.x (obsolete)
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: Evolution Shell Maintainers Team
Evolution QA team
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2008-01-16 13:34 UTC by Jack Schneider
Modified: 2008-01-16 22:43 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.19/2.20


Description Jack Schneider 2008-01-16 13:34:19 UTC 
What were you doing when the application crashed?



Distribution: Debian lenny/sid
Gnome Release: 2.20.2 2007-11-29 (Debian)
BugBuddy Version: 2.20.1

System: Linux 2.6.22-3-amd64 #1 SMP Sun Nov 4 18:18:09 UTC 2007 x86_64
X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation
X Vendor Release: 10300000
Selinux: No
Accessibility: Disabled
GTK+ Theme: Clearlooks
Icon Theme: gnome

Memory status: size: 479272960 vsize: 479272960 resident: 34017280 share: 19611648 rss: 34017280 rss_rlim: 18446744073709551615
CPU usage: start_time: 1200490374 rtime: 270 utime: 232 stime: 38 cutime:3 cstime: 7 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/evolution-2.10'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 0x2b1641c516d0 (LWP 6709)]
[New Thread 0x42003950 (LWP 6833)]
[New Thread 0x41802950 (LWP 6832)]
[New Thread 0x41001950 (LWP 6793)]
[New Thread 0x40800950 (LWP 6792)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0x00002b163948d34f in waitpid () from /lib/libpthread.so.0

+ Trace 185559

Thread 1 (Thread 0x2b1641c516d0 (LWP 6709))

  • #0 waitpid
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0
  • #1 g_spawn_sync
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #2 g_spawn_command_line_sync
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #3 ??
    from /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/modules/libgnomebreakpad.so
  • #4 <signal handler called>
  • #5 g_main_context_check
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #6 ??
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #7 g_main_loop_run
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #8 bonobo_main
    from /usr/lib/libbonobo-2.so.0
  • #9 main
  • #0 waitpid
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0 


----------- .xsession-errors (27 sec old) ---------------------
/usr/share/themes/Clearlooks/gtk-2.0/gtkrc:170: Invalid symbolic color 'tooltip_bg_color'
/usr/share/themes/Clearlooks/gtk-2.0/gtkrc:170: error: invalid identifier `tooltip_bg_color', expected valid identifier
/usr/share/themes/Clearlooks/gtk-2.0/gtkrc:170: Invalid symbolic color 'tooltip_bg_color'
/usr/share/themes/Clearlooks/gtk-2.0/gtkrc:170: error: invalid identifier `tooltip_bg_color', expected valid identifier
xrdb:  "*Label.background" on line 220 overrides entry on line 150
xrdb:  "*Text.background" on line 226 overrides entry on line 191
xrdb:  "*Label.foreground" on line 232 overrides entry on line 151
xrdb:  "*Text.foreground" on line 238 overrides entry on line 192
/usr/share/themes/Clearlooks/gtk-2.0/gtkrc:170: Invalid symbolic color 'tooltip_bg_color'
/usr/share/themes/Clearlooks/gtk-2.0/gtkrc:170: error: invalid identifier `tooltip_bg_color', expected valid identifier
/usr/share/themes/Clearlooks/gtk-2.0/gtkrc:170: Invalid symbolic color 'tooltip_bg_color'
/usr/share/themes/Clearlooks/gtk-2.0/gtkrc:170: error: invalid identifier `tooltip_bg_color', expected valid identifier
/usr/share/themes/Clearlooks/gtk-2.0/gtkrc:170: Invalid symbolic color 'tooltip_bg_color'
/usr/share/themes/Clearlooks/gtk-2.0/gtkrc:170: error: invalid identifier `tooltip_bg_color', expected valid identifier
DEBUG: TITC (mbox:/home/jack/.evolution/mail/local#TITC)
--------------------------------------------------
Comment 1 Tobias Mueller 2008-01-16 22:43:48 UTC 
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but we are happy to tell you that the problem has already been fixed. It should be solved in the next software version. You may want to check for a software upgrade.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 431459 ***