Bug 505841 – crash in Open Folder: trying to browse a folde...

After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.

Bug 505841 - crash in Open Folder: trying to browse a folde...


Summary:	crash in Open Folder: trying to browse a folde...


Status:	RESOLVED INCOMPLETE

Product:	nautilus
Classification:	Core
Component:	general
Version:	2.18.x
Hardware:	Other All

Importance:	High critical
Target Milestone:	---
Assigned To:	Nautilus Maintainers
QA Contact:	Nautilus Maintainers

URL:
Whiteboard:

Duplicates:	505840 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2007-12-27 02:48 UTC by atrvarma
Modified:	2008-02-06 10:16 UTC

See Also:
GNOME target:	---
GNOME version:	2.21/2.22

Description atrvarma 2007-12-27 02:48:59 UTC

Version: 2.18.1

What were you doing when the application crashed?
trying to browse a folder in another partition mounted under "/" after the earlier attempt crashed,and when a new browser window opened automatically


Distribution: Fedora release 7 (Moonshine)
Gnome Release: 2.21.2 2007-11-13 (Red Hat, Inc)
BugBuddy Version: 2.20.0

System: Linux 2.6.23.1-21.fc7 #1 SMP Thu Nov 1 21:09:24 EDT 2007 i686
X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation
X Vendor Release: 10300000
Selinux: Enforcing
Accessibility: Disabled
GTK+ Theme: Clearlooks
Icon Theme: Fedora

Memory status: size: 102641664 vsize: 102641664 resident: 31756288 share: 18178048 rss: 31756288 rss_rlim: 4294967295
CPU usage: start_time: 1198723358 rtime: 2113 utime: 1935 stime: 178 cutime:0 cstime: 0 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/nautilus'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1209026848 (LWP 3095)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0x00110402 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

+ Trace 183178

Thread 1 (Thread -1209026848 (LWP 3095))

#0 __kernel_vsyscall
#1 waitpid
from /lib/libpthread.so.0
#2 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__ENUM
from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
#3 <signal handler called>
#4 __kernel_vsyscall
#5 raise
from /lib/libc.so.6
#6 abort
from /lib/libc.so.6
#7 g_logv
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#8 g_log
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#9 g_assert_warning
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#10 ??
#11 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#12 g_closure_invoke
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#13 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__ENUM
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#14 g_signal_emit_valist
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#15 g_signal_emit
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#16 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__ENUM
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#17 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__BOXED
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#18 g_closure_invoke
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#19 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__ENUM
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#20 g_signal_emit_valist
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#21 g_signal_emit
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#22 gtk_tree_model_row_deleted
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#23 gtk_list_store_remove
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#24 gtk_list_store_clear
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#25 ??
#26 ??
#27 ??
#28 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__ENUM
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#29 g_main_context_dispatch
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#30 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__ENUM
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#31 g_main_loop_run
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#32 gtk_main
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#33 main
#0 __kernel_vsyscall

Comment 1 Cosimo Cecchi 2007-12-27 10:01:16 UTC

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
Unfortunately, that stack trace is missing some elements that will help a lot to solve the problem, so it will be hard for the developers to fix that crash. Can you get us a stack trace with debugging symbols? Please see http://live.gnome.org/GettingTraces for more information on how to do so and reopen this bug or report a new one. Thanks in advance!

Comment 2 Cosimo Cecchi 2007-12-27 10:01:40 UTC

*** Bug 505840 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 3 Akhil Laddha 2008-02-06 10:16:23 UTC

*** Bug 508835 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***