After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 505076 - crash in Computer: afficher les prorieté d ...
crash in Computer: afficher les prorieté d ...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 505002
Product: nautilus
Classification: Core
Component: general
2.18.x
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: Nautilus Maintainers
Nautilus Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2007-12-22 17:34 UTC by rrmazzella
Modified: 2007-12-22 17:37 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.19/2.20



Description rrmazzella 2007-12-22 17:34:42 UTC
Version: 2.18.3

What were you doing when the application crashed?
afficher les prorieté d un fichier


Distribution: Debian lenny/sid
Gnome Release: 2.20.2 2007-11-29 (Debian)
BugBuddy Version: 2.20.1

System: Linux 2.6.22-3-686 #1 SMP Mon Nov 12 08:32:57 UTC 2007 i686
X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation
X Vendor Release: 10300000
Selinux: No
Accessibility: Disabled
GTK+ Theme: Clearlooks
Icon Theme: gnome

Memory status: size: 74575872 vsize: 74575872 resident: 25116672 share: 14516224 rss: 25116672 rss_rlim: 4294967295
CPU usage: start_time: 1198344818 rtime: 78 utime: 71 stime: 7 cutime:0 cstime: 0 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/nautilus'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 0xb6df06b0 (LWP 2752)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

Thread 1 (Thread 0xb6df06b0 (LWP 2752))

  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #1 waitpid
    from /lib/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0
  • #2 g_spawn_sync
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #3 g_spawn_command_line_sync
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #4 ??
    from /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/modules/libgnomebreakpad.so
  • #5 <signal handler called>
  • #6 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #7 raise
    from /lib/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
  • #8 abort
    from /lib/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
  • #9 g_logv
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #10 g_log
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #11 g_assert_warning
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #12 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #13 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #14 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #15 ??
  • #16 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #17 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #18 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #19 ??
  • #20 ??
  • #21 ??
  • #22 ??
  • #23 ??
  • #24 ??
  • #25 ??
  • #26 ??
  • #27 ??
  • #28 ??
  • #29 ??
  • #30 ??
  • #31 ??
  • #32 ??
  • #33 ??
  • #34 ??
  • #35 ??
  • #36 ??
  • #37 ??
  • #38 ??
  • #39 ??
  • #40 ??
  • #41 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #42 ??
  • #43 ??
  • #44 ??
  • #45 ??
  • #46 ??
  • #47 ??
  • #48 ??
  • #49 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #50 ??
  • #51 ??
  • #52 ??
  • #53 ??
  • #54 ??
  • #55 ??
  • #56 g_sequence_sort_changed_iter
  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall


----------- .xsession-errors ---------------------
(gnome-panel:2751): Gtk-WARNING **: gtk_widget_size_allocate(): attempt to allocate widget with width -5 and height 24
** Message: drive = 0
** Message: volume = 0
** Message: drive = 0
** Message: volume = 0
** Message: drive = 0
** Message: volume = 0
** Message: drive = 0
** Message: volume = 0
** Message: drive = 0
** Message: volume = 0
Gtk-ERROR **: file /tmp/buildd/gtk+2.0-2.12.1/gtk/gtkliststore.c: line 1677 (gtk_list_store_compare_func): assertion failed: (VALID_ITER (&iter_b, list_store))
aborting...
--------------------------------------------------
Comment 1 Susana 2007-12-22 17:37:54 UTC
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but the maintainers need more information to fix the bug. Could you please answer the questions in the other report in order to help the developers?


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 505002 ***