After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 496618 - crash in Open Folder: selecting photos to dele...
crash in Open Folder: selecting photos to dele...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 483884
Product: nautilus
Classification: Core
Component: general
2.20.x
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: Nautilus Maintainers
Nautilus Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2007-11-14 01:24 UTC by bwanamushi
Modified: 2007-11-18 02:22 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.19/2.20


Description bwanamushi 2007-11-14 01:24:10 UTC 
Version: 2.20.0

What were you doing when the application crashed?
selecting photos to delete


Distribution: Gentoo Base System release 1.12.10
Gnome Release: 2.20.1 2007-10-30 (Gentoo)
BugBuddy Version: 2.20.1

System: Linux 2.6.20-gentoo #6 SMP Tue Jun 26 10:00:26 EDT 2007 i686
X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation
X Vendor Release: 10400000
Selinux: No
Accessibility: Disabled
GTK+ Theme: Clearlooks-Quicksilver
Icon Theme: Neu

Memory status: size: 186036224 vsize: 186036224 resident: 73768960 share: 23531520 rss: 73768960 rss_rlim: 4294967295
CPU usage: start_time: 1194996233 rtime: 2843 utime: 2437 stime: 406 cutime:8 cstime: 2 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/nautilus'

Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1".
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1237738928 (LWP 5826)]
0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

+ Trace 177565

Thread 1 (Thread -1237738928 (LWP 5826))

  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #1 waitpid
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0
  • #2 IA__g_spawn_sync
    at gspawn.c line 369
  • #3 IA__g_spawn_command_line_sync
    at gspawn.c line 677
  • #4 run_bug_buddy
    at gnome-breakpad.cc line 213
  • #5 check_if_gdb
    at gnome-breakpad.cc line 283
  • #6 google_breakpad::ExceptionHandler::InternalWriteMinidump
    at ../google-breakpad/src/client/linux/handler/exception_handler.cc line 225
  • #7 google_breakpad::ExceptionHandler::HandleException
    at ../google-breakpad/src/client/linux/handler/exception_handler.cc line 196
  • #8 <signal handler called>
  • #9 nautilus_icon_factory_possibly_free_cached_icon
    at nautilus-icon-factory.c line 611
  • #10 g_hash_table_foreach_remove_or_steal
    at ghash.c line 620
  • #11 nautilus_icon_factory_sweep
    at nautilus-icon-factory.c line 636
  • #12 g_timeout_dispatch
    at gmain.c line 3488
  • #13 IA__g_main_context_dispatch
    at gmain.c line 2061
  • #14 g_main_context_iterate
    at gmain.c line 2694
  • #15 IA__g_main_loop_run
    at gmain.c line 2898
  • #16 IA__gtk_main
    at gtkmain.c line 1146
  • #17 main
    at nautilus-main.c line 556
  • #18 __libc_start_main
    at libc-start.c line 229
  • #19 _start
  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall 


----------- .xsession-errors ---------------------
(nautilus:5826): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_ref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed
(nautilus:5826): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_unref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed
(nautilus:5826): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_ref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed
(nautilus:5826): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_unref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed
(nautilus:5826): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_unref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed
/home/sem5t/.themes/Clearlooks-Quicksilver/gtk-2.0/gtkrc:54: Clearlooks configuration option "menuitemstyle" is not supported and will be ignored.
/home/sem5t/.themes/Clearlooks-Quicksilver/gtk-2.0/gtkrc:55: Clearlooks configuration option "listviewitemstyle" is not supported and will be ignored.
/home/sem5t/.themes/Clearlooks-Quicksilver/gtk-2.0/gtkrc:56: Clearlooks configuration option "progressbarstyle" is not supported and will be ignored.
Cannot access memory at address 0x0
Cannot access memory at address 0x0
--------------------------------------------------
Comment 1 André Klapper 2007-11-18 02:22:34 UTC 
Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 483884 ***