GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 492301
crash in Panel:
Last modified: 2007-11-01 15:35:48 UTC
Version: 2.18.3 What were you doing when the application crashed? Distribution: Fedora release 7 (Moonshine) Gnome Release: 2.18.3 2007-07-02 (Red Hat, Inc) BugBuddy Version: 2.18.0 System: Linux 2.6.23.1-10.fc7 #1 SMP Fri Oct 19 15:39:08 EDT 2007 i686 X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation X Vendor Release: 10300000 Selinux: No Accessibility: Disabled GTK+ Theme: Glossy Icon Theme: gnome Memory status: size: 47665152 vsize: 47665152 resident: 25960448 share: 18415616 rss: 25960448 rss_rlim: 4294967295 CPU usage: start_time: 1193910070 rtime: 35 utime: 30 stime: 5 cutime:0 cstime: 0 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100 Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/gnome-panel' (no debugging symbols found) Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1". (no debugging symbols found) [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread -1208731936 (LWP 3236)] (no debugging symbols found) 0x00110402 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
+ Trace 174318
Thread 1 (Thread -1208731936 (LWP 3236))
----------- .xsession-errors --------------------- (bug-buddy:3186): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_unref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed ** ERROR **: file orbit-object.c: line 159 (do_unref): assertion failed: (robj->refs < ORBIT_REFCOUNT_MAX && robj->refs > 0) aborting... (bug-buddy:3228): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: invalid uninstantiatable type `GParamChar' in cast to `GObject' (bug-buddy:3228): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_get_data: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed (bug-buddy:3228): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_hash_table_destroy: assertion `hash_table->ref_count > 0' failed (bug-buddy:3228): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_unref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed ** ERROR **: file orbit-object.c: line 159 (do_unref): assertion failed: (robj->refs < ORBIT_REFCOUNT_MAX && robj->refs > 0) aborting... --------------------------------------------------
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but we are happy to tell you that the problem has already been fixed. It should be solved in the next software version. You may want to check for a software upgrade. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 452428 ***