GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 490904
crash in Panel: Changing backgroup pictu...
Last modified: 2007-10-28 15:03:21 UTC
Version: 2.18.3 What were you doing when the application crashed? Changing backgroup picture Distribution: Fedora release 7 (Moonshine) Gnome Release: 2.18.3 2007-07-02 (Red Hat, Inc) BugBuddy Version: 2.18.0 System: Linux 2.6.22.9-91.fc7 #1 SMP Thu Sep 27 23:10:59 EDT 2007 i686 X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation X Vendor Release: 10300000 Selinux: No Accessibility: Disabled GTK+ Theme: Clearlooks Icon Theme: Fedora Memory status: size: 38535168 vsize: 38535168 resident: 21667840 share: 17043456 rss: 21667840 rss_rlim: 4294967295 CPU usage: start_time: 1193515971 rtime: 168 utime: 148 stime: 20 cutime:0 cstime: 0 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100 Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/gnome-panel' (no debugging symbols found) Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1". (no debugging symbols found) [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread -1208543520 (LWP 5396)] (no debugging symbols found) 0x00110402 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
+ Trace 173312
Thread 1 (Thread -1208543520 (LWP 5396))
----------- .xsession-errors --------------------- (evolution:5546): camel-WARNING **: camel_exception_get_id called with NULL parameter. (evolution:5546): camel-WARNING **: camel_exception_get_id called with NULL parameter. (evolution:5546): camel-WARNING **: camel_exception_get_id called with NULL parameter. (evolution:5546): camel-WARNING **: camel_exception_get_id called with NULL parameter. (evolution:5546): camel-WARNING **: camel_exception_get_id called with NULL parameter. (evolution:5546): camel-WARNING **: camel_exception_get_id called with NULL parameter. ** ERROR **: file orbit-object.c: line 159 (do_unref): assertion failed: (robj->refs < ORBIT_REFCOUNT_MAX && robj->refs > 0) aborting... --------------------------------------------------
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but we are happy to tell you that the problem has already been fixed. It should be solved in the next software version. You may want to check for a software upgrade. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 452428 ***