Bug 488989 – crash in Open Folder:

After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.

Bug 488989 - crash in Open Folder:


Summary:	crash in Open Folder:


Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 439977

Product:	nautilus
Classification:	Core
Component:	general
Version:	2.18.x
Hardware:	Other All

Importance:	High critical
Target Milestone:	---
Assigned To:	Nautilus Maintainers
QA Contact:	Nautilus Maintainers

URL:
Whiteboard:

Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2007-10-22 12:30 UTC by druberry
Modified:	2007-10-22 15:24 UTC

See Also:
GNOME target:	---
GNOME version:	2.17/2.18

Description druberry 2007-10-22 12:30:18 UTC

Version: 2.18.3

What were you doing when the application crashed?



Distribution: Fedora release 7 (Moonshine)
Gnome Release: 2.18.3 2007-07-02 (Red Hat, Inc)
BugBuddy Version: 2.18.0

System: Linux 2.6.22.9-91.fc7 #1 SMP Thu Sep 27 23:10:59 EDT 2007 i686
X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation
X Vendor Release: 10300000
Selinux: No
Accessibility: Disabled
GTK+ Theme: panther-gtk2
Icon Theme: Fedora

Memory status: size: 275193856 vsize: 275193856 resident: 222142464 share: 19550208 rss: 222142464 rss_rlim: 4294967295
CPU usage: start_time: 1193026347 rtime: 9847 utime: 7874 stime: 1973 cutime:0 cstime: 0 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/nautilus'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1208195360 (LWP 1533)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0x00110402 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

+ Trace 171929

Thread 1 (Thread -1208195360 (LWP 1533))

#0 __kernel_vsyscall
#1 waitpid
from /lib/libpthread.so.0
#2 ??
from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
#3 <signal handler called>
#4 ??
from /usr/lib/libgnome-desktop-2.so.2
#5 ??
from /usr/lib/libgnome-desktop-2.so.2
#6 ??
from /usr/lib/libgnome-desktop-2.so.2
#7 gnome_bg_create_pixmap
from /usr/lib/libgnome-desktop-2.so.2
#8 ??
from /usr/lib/libeel-2.so.2
#9 ??
from /usr/lib/libeel-2.so.2
#10 ??
from /usr/lib/libeel-2.so.2
#11 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#12 g_closure_invoke
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#13 ??
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#14 g_signal_emit_valist
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#15 g_signal_emit
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#16 ??
from /usr/lib/libeel-2.so.2
#17 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#18 g_closure_invoke
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#19 ??
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#20 g_signal_emit_valist
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#21 g_signal_emit
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#22 ??
from /usr/lib/libgnome-desktop-2.so.2
#23 ??
from /usr/lib/libeel-2.so.2
#24 ??
from /usr/lib/libeel-2.so.2
#25 ??
#26 ??
#27 ??
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#28 g_main_context_dispatch
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#29 ??
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#30 g_main_loop_run
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#31 gtk_main
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#32 main
#0 __kernel_vsyscall



----------- .xsession-errors (9 sec old) ---------------------
warning: .dynamic section for "/lib/libssl.so.6" is not at the expected address
warning: difference appears to be caused by prelink, adjusting expectations
warning: .dynamic section for "/lib/libcrypto.so.6" is not at the expected address
warning: difference appears to be caused by prelink, adjusting expectations
warning: .dynamic section for "/usr/lib/libgnome-window-settings.so.1" is not at the expected address
warning: difference appears to be caused by prelink, adjusting expectations
warning: .dynamic section for "/usr/lib/libpanel-applet-2.so.0" is not at the expected address
warning: difference appears to be caused by prelink, adjusting expectations
--------------------------------------------------

Comment 1 André Klapper 2007-10-22 15:24:02 UTC

Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 439977 ***