Bug 484935 – crash in Calendar: reading e-mail

After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.

Bug 484935 - crash in Calendar: reading e-mail


Summary:	crash in Calendar: reading e-mail


Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 444866

Product:	evolution
Classification:	Applications
Component:	Calendar
Version:	2.10.x (obsolete)
Hardware:	Other All

Importance:	High critical
Target Milestone:	---
Assigned To:	evolution-calendar-maintainers
QA Contact:	Evolution QA team

URL:
Whiteboard:

Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2007-10-09 04:39 UTC by tongy
Modified:	2007-10-09 18:06 UTC

See Also:
GNOME target:	---
GNOME version:	2.17/2.18

Description tongy 2007-10-09 04:39:46 UTC

Version: 2.10

What were you doing when the application crashed?
reading e-mail


Distribution: Fedora release 7 (Moonshine)
Gnome Release: 2.18.3 2007-07-02 (Red Hat, Inc)
BugBuddy Version: 2.18.0

System: Linux 2.6.22.9-91.fc7 #1 SMP Thu Sep 27 23:10:59 EDT 2007 i686
X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation
X Vendor Release: 10300000
Selinux: Enforcing
Accessibility: Disabled
GTK+ Theme: Clearlooks
Icon Theme: Fedora

Memory status: size: 178307072 vsize: 178307072 resident: 69365760 share: 42278912 rss: 69365760 rss_rlim: 4294967295
CPU usage: start_time: 1191931407 rtime: 932 utime: 871 stime: 61 cutime:37 cstime: 12 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/evolution'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1208240416 (LWP 4063)]
[New Thread -1400038512 (LWP 4502)]
[New Thread -1389548656 (LWP 4501)]
[New Thread -1242043504 (LWP 4102)]
[New Thread -1336321136 (LWP 4089)]
[New Thread -1263023216 (LWP 4084)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0x0012d402 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

+ Trace 168931

Thread 1 (Thread -1208240416 (LWP 4063))

#0 __kernel_vsyscall
#1 waitpid
from /lib/libpthread.so.0
#2 ??
from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
#3 ??
#4 <signal handler called>
#5 ??
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#6 ??
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#7 ??
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#8 g_slice_free_chain_with_offset
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#9 g_slist_free
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#10 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
#11 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
#12 html_object_destroy
from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
#13 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
#14 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
#15 html_object_destroy
from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
#16 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
#17 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
#18 html_object_destroy
from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
#19 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
#20 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
#21 html_object_destroy
from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
#22 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
#23 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
#24 html_object_destroy
from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
#25 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
#26 g_object_unref
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#27 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
#28 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#29 ??
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#30 g_closure_invoke
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#31 ??
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#32 g_signal_emit_valist
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#33 g_signal_emit
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#34 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#35 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#36 g_object_run_dispose
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#37 gtk_object_destroy
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#38 gtk_widget_destroy
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#39 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#40 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#41 gtk_container_foreach
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#42 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#43 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#44 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#45 ??
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#46 g_closure_invoke
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#47 ??
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#48 g_signal_emit_valist
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#49 g_signal_emit
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#50 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#51 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#52 g_object_unref
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#53 ??
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#54 g_value_unset
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#55 g_signal_emit_valist
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#56 g_signal_emit
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#57 gtk_container_remove
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#58 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
#59 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
#60 html_object_destroy
from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
#61 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
#62 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
#63 html_object_destroy
from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
#64 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
#65 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
#66 html_object_destroy
from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
#67 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
#68 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
#69 html_object_destroy
from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
#70 html_engine_parse
from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
#71 gtk_html_begin_full
from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
#72 ??
from /usr/lib/evolution/2.10/components/libevolution-mail.so
#73 ??
from /usr/lib/evolution/2.10/components/libevolution-mail.so
#74 ??
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#75 g_main_context_dispatch
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#76 ??
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#77 g_main_loop_run
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#78 bonobo_main
from /usr/lib/libbonobo-2.so.0
#79 main
#0 __kernel_vsyscall

Comment 1 Tobias Mueller 2007-10-09 18:06:02 UTC

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but the maintainers need more information to fix the bug. Could you please answer the questions in the other report in order to help the developers?


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 444866 ***