Bug 475268 – crash in Tasks: sending mail via smtp-ss...

After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.

Bug 475268 - crash in Tasks: sending mail via smtp-ss...


Summary:	crash in Tasks: sending mail via smtp-ss...


Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 443410

Product:	evolution
Classification:	Applications
Component:	Tasks
Version:	unspecified
Hardware:	Other All

Importance:	High critical
Target Milestone:	---
Assigned To:	evolution-calendar-maintainers
QA Contact:	Evolution QA team

URL:
Whiteboard:

Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2007-09-09 22:06 UTC by franz
Modified:	2007-10-06 12:31 UTC

See Also:
GNOME target:	---
GNOME version:	2.17/2.18

Description franz 2007-09-09 22:06:01 UTC

Version: 2.10

What were you doing when the application crashed?
sending mail via smtp-ssl


Distribution: Fedora release 7 (Moonshine)
Gnome Release: 2.18.3 2007-07-02 (Red Hat, Inc)
BugBuddy Version: 2.18.0

System: Linux 2.6.22.4-65.fc7 #1 SMP Tue Aug 21 21:50:50 EDT 2007 x86_64
X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation
X Vendor Release: 10300000
Selinux: Permissive
Accessibility: Disabled
GTK+ Theme: Clearlooks
Icon Theme: Fedora

Memory status: size: 644587520 vsize: 644587520 resident: 56111104 share: 33902592 rss: 56111104 rss_rlim: 18446744073709551615
CPU usage: start_time: 1189349954 rtime: 880 utime: 804 stime: 76 cutime:2 cstime: 11 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/evolution'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib64/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 46912496357520 (LWP 10922)]
[New Thread 1115699536 (LWP 11082)]
[New Thread 1126189392 (LWP 11076)]
[New Thread 1094986064 (LWP 11020)]
[New Thread 1136679248 (LWP 11018)]
[New Thread 1084229968 (LWP 10957)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0x00000032c3e0d97f in waitpid () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0

+ Trace 161643

Thread 1 (Thread 46912496357520 (LWP 10922))

#0 waitpid
from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
#1 ??
from /usr/lib64/libgnomeui-2.so.0
#2 <signal handler called>
#3 ??
from /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0
#4 ??
from /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0
#5 ??
from /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0
#6 g_slice_free1
from /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0
#7 g_ptr_array_free
from /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0
#8 ??
from /usr/lib64/librsvg-2.so.2
#9 ??
from /usr/lib64/librsvg-2.so.2
#10 ??
from /usr/lib64/librsvg-2.so.2
#11 ??
from /usr/lib64/librsvg-2.so.2
#12 g_object_unref
from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#13 ??
from /usr/lib64/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/loaders/svg_loader.so
#14 gdk_pixbuf_loader_close
from /usr/lib64/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0
#15 ??
from /usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#16 gtk_icon_info_load_icon
from /usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#17 gtk_icon_theme_load_icon
from /usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#18 ??
from /usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#19 ??
from /usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#20 ??
from /usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#21 g_closure_invoke
from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#22 ??
from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#23 g_signal_emit_valist
from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#24 g_signal_emit
from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#25 gtk_widget_realize
from /usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#26 ??
from /usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#27 g_closure_invoke
from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#28 ??
from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#29 g_signal_emit_valist
from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#30 g_signal_emit
from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#31 gtk_widget_show
from /usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#32 gtk_dialog_run
from /usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#33 ??
from /usr/lib64/libedataserverui-1.2.so.8
#34 g_main_context_dispatch
from /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0
#35 ??
from /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0
#36 g_main_loop_run
from /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0
#37 bonobo_main
from /usr/lib64/libbonobo-2.so.0
#38 main
#0 waitpid
from /lib64/libpthread.so.0

Comment 1 Susana 2007-10-06 12:31:07 UTC

Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 443410 ***