After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 473331 - gnome-terminal screen integration
gnome-terminal screen integration
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 332148
Product: gnome-terminal
Classification: Core
Component: general
2.17.x
Other All
: Normal enhancement
: ---
Assigned To: GNOME Terminal Maintainers
GNOME Terminal Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2007-09-03 21:37 UTC by John Richard Moser
Modified: 2007-09-03 21:52 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: Unversioned Enhancement



Description John Richard Moser 2007-09-03 21:37:40 UTC
gnome-terminal integration with screen would provide a powerful terminal environment.  gnome-terminal could utilize screen as a terminal back-end and connect to existing screen processes to manage terminals, allowing users to close terminals as with screen.  Further, gnome-terminal integration with screen may lead to features like scrolling when running screen.

Using screen as a terminal back-end provides the core of this feature request.  gnome-terminal should look for an existing, live screen session owned by the user when running, and create a new screen under that.

An instance of gnome-terminal should allow the user to select from a list of screen sessions and attach to screens under them, or create new screens under them.

gnome-terminal should share screens (screen -x -r).  This will allow users to connect to screens already open on an ssh connection or by another gnome-terminal.

gnome-terminal should integrate with the screen buffer and allow full scrolling of sessions running under screen.

gnome-terminal should allow non-screen tabs still, as terminal behavior under screen does not match terminal behavior under xterm or linux terminals.
Comment 1 Behdad Esfahbod 2007-09-03 21:52:47 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 332148 ***