Bug 471197 – crash in Tasks: adding an entry to my ad...

After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.

Bug 471197 - crash in Tasks: adding an entry to my ad...


Summary:	crash in Tasks: adding an entry to my ad...


Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 436128

Product:	evolution
Classification:	Applications
Component:	Tasks
Version:	unspecified
Hardware:	Other All

Importance:	High critical
Target Milestone:	---
Assigned To:	evolution-calendar-maintainers
QA Contact:	Evolution QA team

URL:
Whiteboard:

Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2007-08-28 16:11 UTC by garnet ulrich
Modified:	2007-09-24 16:24 UTC

See Also:
GNOME target:	---
GNOME version:	2.17/2.18

Description garnet ulrich 2007-08-28 16:11:36 UTC

Version: 2.10

What were you doing when the application crashed?
adding an entry to my address book.  evolution has become very unstable since I started using the exchange connector.


Distribution: Fedora release 7 (Moonshine)
Gnome Release: 2.18.3 2007-07-02 (Red Hat, Inc)
BugBuddy Version: 2.18.0

System: Linux 2.6.21-1.3194.fc7 #1 SMP Wed May 23 22:35:01 EDT 2007 i686
X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation
X Vendor Release: 10300000
Selinux: Enforcing
Accessibility: Disabled
GTK+ Theme: Clearlooks
Icon Theme: Fedora

Memory status: size: 204591104 vsize: 204591104 resident: 70340608 share: 44621824 rss: 70340608 rss_rlim: 4294967295
CPU usage: start_time: 1188311995 rtime: 3130 utime: 2784 stime: 346 cutime:34 cstime: 13 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/evolution'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1208289568 (LWP 3774)]
[New Thread -1345467504 (LWP 4682)]
[New Thread -1276900464 (LWP 3869)]
[New Thread -1288705136 (LWP 3819)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0x00e82402 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

+ Trace 158584

Thread 1 (Thread -1208289568 (LWP 3774))

#0 __kernel_vsyscall
#1 waitpid
from /lib/libpthread.so.0
#2 ??
from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
#3 ??
#4 <signal handler called>
#5 ??
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#6 ??
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#7 ??
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#8 g_slice_free_chain_with_offset
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#9 g_slist_free
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#10 ??
from /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0
#11 ??
from /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0
#12 g_object_unref
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#13 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#14 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__OBJECT
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#15 ??
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#16 g_closure_invoke
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#17 ??
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#18 g_signal_emit_valist
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#19 g_signal_emit
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#20 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#21 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#22 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#23 gtk_container_forall
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#24 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#25 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#26 gtk_container_forall
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#27 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#28 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#29 gtk_container_forall
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#30 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#31 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#32 gtk_container_forall
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#33 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#34 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#35 gtk_container_forall
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#36 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#37 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#38 gtk_widget_unparent
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#39 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#40 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__OBJECT
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#41 ??
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#42 g_closure_invoke
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#43 ??
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#44 g_signal_emit_valist
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#45 g_signal_emit
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#46 gtk_container_remove
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#47 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#48 g_object_run_dispose
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#49 gtk_object_destroy
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#50 gtk_widget_destroy
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#51 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#52 gtk_container_foreach
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#53 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#54 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#55 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#56 ??
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#57 g_closure_invoke
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#58 ??
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#59 g_signal_emit_valist
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#60 g_signal_emit
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#61 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#62 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#63 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#64 g_object_run_dispose
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#65 gtk_object_destroy
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#66 gtk_widget_destroy
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#67 ??
from /usr/lib/evolution/2.10/libecontacteditor.so.0
#68 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#69 g_closure_invoke
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#70 ??
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#71 g_signal_emit_valist
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#72 g_signal_emit
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#73 gtk_dialog_response
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#74 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#75 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#76 g_closure_invoke
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#77 ??
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#78 g_signal_emit_valist
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#79 g_signal_emit
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#80 gtk_button_clicked
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#81 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#82 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#83 ??
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#84 g_closure_invoke
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#85 ??
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#86 g_signal_emit_valist
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#87 g_signal_emit
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#88 gtk_button_released
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#89 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#90 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#91 ??
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#92 g_closure_invoke
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#93 ??
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#94 g_signal_emit_valist
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#95 g_signal_emit
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#96 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#97 gtk_propagate_event
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#98 gtk_main_do_event
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#99 ??
from /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
#100 g_main_context_dispatch
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#101 ??
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#102 g_main_loop_run
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#103 bonobo_main
from /usr/lib/libbonobo-2.so.0
#104 main
#0 __kernel_vsyscall



----------- .xsession-errors ---------------------
(evolution:3774): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_ref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed
(evolution:3774): libebook-CRITICAL **: e_book_async_open: assertion `book && E_IS_BOOK (book)' failed
(evolution:3774): e-data-server-ui-CRITICAL **: e_source_combo_box_set_active_uid: assertion `gtk_tree_row_reference_valid (reference)' failed
(evolution:3774): libebook-CRITICAL **: file e-book.c: line 3807: assertion `source && E_IS_SOURCE (source)' failed
warning: .dynamic section for "/usr/lib/libsoup-2.2.so.8" is not at the expected address
warning: difference appears to be caused by prelink, adjusting expectations
warning: .dynamic section for "/usr/lib/libexchange-storage-1.2.so.3" is not at the expected address
warning: difference appears to be caused by prelink, adjusting expectations
--------------------------------------------------

Comment 1 palfrey 2007-09-24 16:24:05 UTC

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but the maintainers need more information to fix the bug. Could you please answer the questions in the other report in order to help the developers?

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 436128 ***