After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 465156 - crash in File Browser:
crash in File Browser:
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 439977
Product: nautilus
Classification: Core
Component: general
2.18.x
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: Nautilus Maintainers
Nautilus Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2007-08-09 19:09 UTC by kyblicek
Modified: 2007-08-10 14:11 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.17/2.18



Description kyblicek 2007-08-09 19:09:05 UTC
Version: 2.18.3

What were you doing when the application crashed?



Distribution: Fedora release 7 (Moonshine)
Gnome Release: 2.18.3 2007-07-02 (Red Hat, Inc)
BugBuddy Version: 2.18.0

System: Linux 2.6.22.1-41_1.cubbi_tuxonice.fc7 #1 SMP Wed Aug 1 22:52:42 CEST 2007 i686
X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation
X Vendor Release: 10300000
Selinux: No
Accessibility: Disabled
GTK+ Theme: Clearlooks
Icon Theme: Clearlooks

Memory status: size: 121978880 vsize: 121978880 resident: 42209280 share: 31465472 rss: 42209280 rss_rlim: 4294967295
CPU usage: start_time: 1186686469 rtime: 105 utime: 68 stime: 37 cutime:0 cstime: 0 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/nautilus'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1208912160 (LWP 3172)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0x00110402 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

Thread 1 (Thread -1208912160 (LWP 3172))

  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #1 waitpid
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0
  • #2 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #3 <signal handler called>
  • #4 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgnome-desktop-2.so.2
  • #5 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgnome-desktop-2.so.2
  • #6 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgnome-desktop-2.so.2
  • #7 gnome_bg_create_pixmap
    from /usr/lib/libgnome-desktop-2.so.2
  • #8 ??
    from /usr/lib/libeel-2.so.2
  • #9 ??
    from /usr/lib/libeel-2.so.2
  • #10 ??
    from /usr/lib/libeel-2.so.2
  • #11 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #12 g_closure_invoke
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #13 ??
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #14 g_signal_emit_valist
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #15 g_signal_emit
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #16 ??
    from /usr/lib/libeel-2.so.2
  • #17 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #18 g_closure_invoke
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #19 ??
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #20 g_signal_emit_valist
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #21 g_signal_emit
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #22 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgnome-desktop-2.so.2
  • #23 ??
    from /usr/lib/libeel-2.so.2
  • #24 ??
    from /usr/lib/libeel-2.so.2
  • #25 ??
  • #26 ??
  • #27 ??
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #28 g_main_context_dispatch
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #29 ??
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #30 g_main_loop_run
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #31 gtk_main
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #32 main
  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall


----------- .xsession-errors (24 sec old) ---------------------
(bug-buddy:3455): Gtk-WARNING **: Icon cache '/usr/share/icons/hicolor/icon-theme.cache' is invalid
(bug-buddy:3455): Gtk-WARNING **: Icon cache '/usr/share/icons/hicolor/icon-theme.cache' is invalid
(bug-buddy:3455): Gtk-WARNING **: Icon cache '/usr/share/icons/hicolor/icon-theme.cache' is invalid
(bug-buddy:3455): Gtk-WARNING **: Icon cache '/usr/share/icons/hicolor/icon-theme.cache' is invalid
...Too much output, ignoring rest...
--------------------------------------------------
Comment 1 Susana 2007-08-10 14:11:43 UTC
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but the maintainers need more information to fix the bug. Could you please answer the questions in the other report in order to help the developers?


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 439977 ***