After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 465018 - crash in Image Viewer:
crash in Image Viewer:
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 320206
Product: eog
Classification: Core
Component: general
unspecified
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: EOG Maintainers
EOG Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2007-08-09 11:56 UTC by papacito231
Modified: 2007-08-09 14:23 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.17/2.18



Description papacito231 2007-08-09 11:56:58 UTC
Version: 2.18.0.1

What were you doing when the application crashed?



Distribution: Fedora release 7 (Moonshine)
Gnome Release: 2.18.0 2007-03-23 (Red Hat, Inc)
BugBuddy Version: 2.18.0

System: Linux 2.6.20-2925.9.fc7xen #1 SMP Tue May 22 08:53:03 EDT 2007 i686
X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation
X Vendor Release: 10300000
Selinux: Enforcing
Accessibility: Disabled
GTK+ Theme: Bluecurve-Lime
Icon Theme: gnome

Memory status: size: 72245248 vsize: 72245248 resident: 21745664 share: 10952704 rss: 21745664 rss_rlim: 4294967295
CPU usage: start_time: 1186660435 rtime: 648 utime: 554 stime: 94 cutime:11 cstime: 34 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/eog'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/i686/nosegneg/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1208801040 (LWP 2998)]
[New Thread -1237169264 (LWP 3002)]
[New Thread -1211053168 (LWP 3001)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0x0053c402 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

Thread 3 (Thread -1211053168 (LWP 3001))

  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #1 waitpid
    from /lib/i686/nosegneg/libpthread.so.0
  • #2 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID
    from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #3 <signal handler called>
  • #4 eog_image_load
  • #5 ??
  • #6 eog_job_call_action
  • #7 ??
  • #8 ??
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #9 start_thread
    from /lib/i686/nosegneg/libpthread.so.0
  • #10 clone
    from /lib/i686/nosegneg/libc.so.6


----------- .xsession-errors ---------------------
Very strange! got a DCOPReplyFailed opcode, but we were not waiting for a reply!
Very strange! got a DCOPReplyFailed opcode, but we were not waiting for a reply!
Very strange! got a DCOPReplyFailed opcode, but we were not waiting for a reply!
Very strange! got a DCOPReplyFailed opcode, but we were not waiting for a reply!
Very strange! got a DCOPReplyFailed opcode, but we were not waiting for a reply!
Very strange! got a DCOPReplyFailed opcode, but we were not waiting for a reply!
Very strange! got a DCOPReplyFailed opcode, but we were not waiting for a reply!
Very strange! got a DCOPReplyFailed opcode, but we were not waiting for a reply!
Very strange! got a DCOPReplyFailed opcode, but we were not waiting for a reply!
Very strange! got a DCOPReplyFailed opcode, but we were not waiting for a reply!
Very strange! got a DCOPReplyFailed opcode, but we were not waiting for a reply!
Very strange! got a DCOPReplyFailed opcode, but we were not waiting for a reply!
Very strange! got a DCOPReplyFailed opcode, but we were not waiting for a reply!
Very strange! got a DCOPReplyFailed opcode, but we were not waiting for a reply!
Very strange! got a DCOPReplyFailed opcode, but we were not waiting for a reply!
--------------------------------------------------
Comment 1 Iestyn Pryce 2007-08-09 14:23:14 UTC
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but we are happy to tell you that the problem has already been fixed. It should be solved in the next software version. You may want to check for a software upgrade.

Duplicate via stacktrace in bug 357405 and then via  bug 354327

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 320206 ***