After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 463693 - The main page needs update according to the wgo revamp
The main page needs update according to the wgo revamp
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: website
Classification: Infrastructure
Component: developer.gnome.org
current
Other Linux
: Normal major
: ---
Assigned To: GNOME Web maintainers
GNOME Web maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2007-08-05 16:52 UTC by Quim Gil
Modified: 2011-04-06 16:38 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Description Quim Gil 2007-08-05 16:52:21 UTC 
As agreed in http://live.gnome.org/GnomeWeb/Navigation :

The "Development" link in the top GNOME navigation bar links to developer.gnome.org BUT not the current outdated subsite to be dismantled (see http://live.gnome.org/GnomeWeb/DeveloperGnomeOrg ). We would keep the (cool) subdomain as a launcher to all the developer related subsites:

 * Library - the documentation for developers
 * GNOME Live!
 * Bugzilla
 * GNOME Mail Services
 * GNOME SVN Services
 * http://download.gnome.org
 * GTK+
 * ... and other minor websites for developers such as http://pango.org/ and the language bindings.
Comment 1 Andreas Nilsson 2007-08-15 22:56:56 UTC 
Alberto Ruiz (arc) and I are going to look into this.
Comment 2 Murray Cumming 2007-08-28 16:04:33 UTC 
So this is just about changing the content at developer.gnome.org, right? Or do you have plans to use a different system (a plone page?) for the developer.gnome.org content?

http://developer.gnome.org/doc/API will soon be redirected to library.gnome.org. Some of it already is. Otherwise, I guess it's just a matter of cleaning out the outdated stuff.
Comment 3 Quim Gil 2007-09-02 14:10:24 UTC 
Only the content at developer.gnome.org main page. It can stay as static HTML by now.
Comment 4 Murray Cumming 2007-09-06 15:50:51 UTC 
In the last 2 days I have cleaned up lots of developer.gnome.org, changing the links to point to live.gnome.org or library.gnome.org where appropriate, and simply deleting content that is obviously useless.

Some content is still in svn and hosted (built by build system) because it does not exist elsewhere. But it is not linked from the main developer.gnome.org pages.

The largest amount of remaining content is under projects/. That's unlikely to move elsewhere anytime soon, because it offers more cosmetically-attractive hosting than live.gnome.org. I think that's OK for now, though we might want to change th e URL to projects.gnome.org/.

The other remaining content is developer documentation that should be moved to other GNOME modules, such as the application that it documents, or to gnome-devel-docs. I will try to make that happen.
Comment 5 Murray Cumming 2008-10-29 08:02:42 UTC 
The developer.gnome.org cleanup is now complete. The page just links to library.gnome.org and some archived stuff. I suspect that we will kill even the archive eventually.

So I don't see much point in changing the style.
Comment 6 Frederic Peters 2011-04-06 16:38:15 UTC 
developer.gnome.org is revived, and got the new style before www.gnome.org :)