After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 463456 - crash in Tasks: I was configuring an LDA...
crash in Tasks: I was configuring an LDA...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 444924
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: Tasks
unspecified
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: evolution-calendar-maintainers
Evolution QA team
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2007-08-04 17:07 UTC by matthew.ross
Modified: 2007-08-10 18:53 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.17/2.18



Description matthew.ross 2007-08-04 17:07:15 UTC
Version: 2.10

What were you doing when the application crashed?
I was configuring an LDAP server.  I had just deleted an incorrect search base from the text box and pressed OK.  Then it crashed and the bug buddy interface was displayed.


Distribution: Fedora release 7 (Moonshine)
Gnome Release: 2.18.3 2007-07-02 (Red Hat, Inc)
BugBuddy Version: 2.18.0

System: Linux 2.6.21-1.3228.fc7 #1 SMP Tue Jun 12 15:37:31 EDT 2007 i686
X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation
X Vendor Release: 10300000
Selinux: Enforcing
Accessibility: Disabled
GTK+ Theme: Clearlooks
Icon Theme: Fedora

Memory status: size: 127389696 vsize: 127389696 resident: 47558656 share: 32993280 rss: 47558656 rss_rlim: 4294967295
CPU usage: start_time: 1186246236 rtime: 1524 utime: 1425 stime: 99 cutime:0 cstime: 2 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/evolution'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1209092384 (LWP 21834)]
[New Thread -1230652528 (LWP 21867)]
[New Thread -1241142384 (LWP 21866)]
[New Thread -1219748976 (LWP 21853)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0x00d27402 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

Thread 1 (Thread -1209092384 (LWP 21834))

  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #1 waitpid
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0
  • #2 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #3 ??
  • #4 <signal handler called>
  • #5 ??
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #6 ??
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #7 ??
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #8 g_slice_free_chain_with_offset
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #9 g_slist_free
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #10 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #11 g_hash_table_foreach
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #12 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #13 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #14 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #15 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #16 ??
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #17 g_closure_invoke
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #18 ??
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #19 g_signal_emit_valist
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #20 g_signal_emit
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #21 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #22 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #23 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #24 g_object_run_dispose
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #25 gtk_object_destroy
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #26 gtk_widget_destroy
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #27 ??
    from /usr/lib/evolution/2.10/libeutil.so.0
  • #28 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #29 g_closure_invoke
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #30 ??
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #31 g_signal_emit_valist
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #32 g_signal_emit
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #33 gtk_dialog_response
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #34 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #35 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #36 g_closure_invoke
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #37 ??
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #38 g_signal_emit_valist
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #39 g_signal_emit
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #40 gtk_button_clicked
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #41 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #42 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #43 ??
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #44 g_closure_invoke
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #45 ??
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #46 g_signal_emit_valist
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #47 g_signal_emit
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #48 gtk_button_released
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #49 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #50 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #51 ??
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #52 g_closure_invoke
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #53 ??
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #54 g_signal_emit_valist
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #55 g_signal_emit
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #56 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #57 gtk_propagate_event
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #58 gtk_main_do_event
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #59 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #60 g_main_context_dispatch
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #61 ??
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #62 g_main_loop_run
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #63 bonobo_main
    from /usr/lib/libbonobo-2.so.0
  • #64 main
  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall


----------- .xsession-errors (114 sec old) ---------------------
new dimensions = (48,48)
we need to scale up
scale = 1
index:0
new dimensions = (48,48)
initial setting of an image.  no scaling
scale = 1
new dimensions = (48,48)
we need to scale up
scale = 1
: Old width = 150.000000, New width = 404.000000
: Old width = 404.000000, New width = 453.000000
: Old width = 453.000000, New width = 510.000000
(evolution:21834): e-utils-WARNING **: calling e_icon_factory_get_icon_filename with unknown icon_size value (48)
--------------------------------------------------
Comment 1 Susana 2007-08-10 18:53:10 UTC
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but the maintainers need more information to fix the bug. Could you please answer the questions in the other report in order to help the developers?


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 444924 ***