Bug 459599 – crash in Open Folder:

After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.

Bug 459599 - crash in Open Folder:


Summary:	crash in Open Folder:


Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 439593

Product:	nautilus
Classification:	Core
Component:	general
Version:	2.18.x
Hardware:	Other All

Importance:	High critical
Target Milestone:	---
Assigned To:	Nautilus Maintainers
QA Contact:	Nautilus Maintainers

URL:
Whiteboard:

Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2007-07-23 15:03 UTC by carlback
Modified:	2007-07-30 00:22 UTC

See Also:
GNOME target:	---
GNOME version:	2.17/2.18

Description carlback 2007-07-23 15:03:41 UTC

Version: 2.18.3

What were you doing when the application crashed?



Distribution: Fedora release 7 (Moonshine)
Gnome Release: 2.18.3 2007-07-02 (Red Hat, Inc)
BugBuddy Version: 2.18.0

System: Linux 2.6.21-1.3228.fc7 #1 SMP Tue Jun 12 15:37:31 EDT 2007 i686
X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation
X Vendor Release: 10300000
Selinux: No
Accessibility: Disabled
GTK+ Theme: Glossy P
Icon Theme: Tango

Memory status: size: 399138816 vsize: 399138816 resident: 327290880 share: 19451904 rss: 327290880 rss_rlim: 4294967295
CPU usage: start_time: 1185137559 rtime: 1363 utime: 1163 stime: 200 cutime:0 cstime: 0 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/nautilus'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1208244512 (LWP 3200)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0x00f3d402 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

+ Trace 149998

Thread 1 (Thread -1208244512 (LWP 3200))

#0 __kernel_vsyscall
#1 waitpid
from /lib/libpthread.so.0
#2 ??
from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
#3 <signal handler called>
#4 ??
from /usr/lib/libgnome-desktop-2.so.2
#5 ??
from /usr/lib/libgnome-desktop-2.so.2
#6 ??
from /usr/lib/libgnome-desktop-2.so.2
#7 gnome_bg_changes_with_size
from /usr/lib/libgnome-desktop-2.so.2
#8 ??
from /usr/lib/libeel-2.so.2
#9 ??
from /usr/lib/libeel-2.so.2
#10 ??
from /usr/lib/libeel-2.so.2
#11 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#12 g_closure_invoke
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#13 ??
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#14 g_signal_emit_valist
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#15 g_signal_emit
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#16 ??
from /usr/lib/libeel-2.so.2
#17 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#18 g_closure_invoke
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#19 ??
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#20 g_signal_emit_valist
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#21 g_signal_emit
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#22 ??
from /usr/lib/libgnome-desktop-2.so.2
#23 ??
from /usr/lib/libeel-2.so.2
#24 ??
from /usr/lib/libeel-2.so.2
#25 ??
#26 ??
#27 ??
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#28 g_main_context_dispatch
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#29 ??
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#30 g_main_loop_run
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#31 gtk_main
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#32 main
#0 __kernel_vsyscall



----------- .xsession-errors ---------------------
warning: .dynamic section for "/usr/lib/libpoppler.so.1" is not at the expected address
warning: difference appears to be caused by prelink, adjusting expectations
warning: .dynamic section for "/usr/lib/libgnome-window-settings.so.1" is not at the expected address
warning: difference appears to be caused by prelink, adjusting expectations
warning: .dynamic section for "/usr/lib/libpanel-applet-2.so.0" is not at the expected address
warning: difference appears to be caused by prelink, adjusting expectations
warning: .dynamic section for "/usr/lib/libmetacity-private.so.0" is not at the expected address
warning: difference appears to be caused by prelink, adjusting expectations
--------------------------------------------------

Comment 1 André Klapper 2007-07-30 00:22:16 UTC

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but the maintainers need more information to fix the bug. Could you please answer the questions in the other report in order to help the developers?


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 439593 ***