GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 458579
crash in Email:
Last modified: 2007-07-20 16:34:27 UTC
Version: 2.10 What were you doing when the application crashed? Distribution: Fedora release 7 (Moonshine) Gnome Release: 2.18.3 2007-07-02 (Red Hat, Inc) BugBuddy Version: 2.18.0 System: Linux 2.6.21-1.3228.fc7 #1 SMP Tue Jun 12 15:37:31 EDT 2007 i686 X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation X Vendor Release: 10300000 Selinux: Enforcing Accessibility: Disabled GTK+ Theme: Clearlooks Icon Theme: Fedora Memory status: size: 114294784 vsize: 114294784 resident: 35659776 share: 28663808 rss: 35659776 rss_rlim: 4294967295 CPU usage: start_time: 1184922302 rtime: 93 utime: 81 stime: 12 cutime:5 cstime: 9 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100 Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/evolution' (no debugging symbols found) Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1". (no debugging symbols found) [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread -1208497424 (LWP 4307)] [New Thread -1251427440 (LWP 4343)] [New Thread -1230443632 (LWP 4340)] (no debugging symbols found) 0x00e55402 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
+ Trace 149297
Thread 3 (Thread -1230443632 (LWP 4340))
----------- .xsession-errors (8 sec old) --------------------- (evolution:4307): camel-pop3-provider-WARNING **: Bad server response: Subject: SUSPECT: TreSiti di oggi (11/07/07) (evolution:4307): camel-pop3-provider-WARNING **: Bad server response: Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 01:53:10 +0100 (evolution:4307): camel-pop3-provider-WARNING **: Bad server response: MIME-Version: 1.0 (evolution:4307): camel-pop3-provider-WARNING **: Bad server response: * (evolution:4307): camel-pop3-provider-WARNING **: Bad server response: I nostri prodotti in prova gratuita! --------------------------------------------------
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but the maintainers need more information to fix the bug. Could you please answer the questions in the other report in order to help the developers? *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 456623 ***