GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 457729
crash in Tasks: Looked at a jpeg in an e...
Last modified: 2007-07-17 22:04:04 UTC
Version: 2.10 What were you doing when the application crashed? Looked at a jpeg in an email Distribution: Fedora release 7 (Moonshine) Gnome Release: 2.18.3 2007-07-02 (Red Hat, Inc) BugBuddy Version: 2.18.0 System: Linux 2.6.21-1.3228.fc7 #1 SMP Tue Jun 12 15:37:31 EDT 2007 i686 X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation X Vendor Release: 10300000 Selinux: No Accessibility: Disabled GTK+ Theme: Clearlooks Icon Theme: Fedora Memory status: size: 167522304 vsize: 167522304 resident: 60694528 share: 44032000 rss: 60694528 rss_rlim: 4294967295 CPU usage: start_time: 1184683878 rtime: 7022 utime: 6557 stime: 465 cutime:0 cstime: 0 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100 Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/evolution' (no debugging symbols found) Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1". (no debugging symbols found) [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread -1209182496 (LWP 18268)] [New Thread -1303622768 (LWP 20635)] [New Thread -1229984880 (LWP 18290)] [New Thread -1314112624 (LWP 18288)] [New Thread -1240478832 (LWP 18276)] (no debugging symbols found) 0x00f85402 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
+ Trace 148650
Thread 1 (Thread -1209182496 (LWP 18268))
----------- .xsession-errors (6 sec old) --------------------- Major opcode: 54 Minor opcode: 0 Resource id: 0x1431a5b X Error: BadMatch (invalid parameter attributes) 8 Major opcode: 158 Minor opcode: 6 Resource id: 0x1431a5b X Error: BadPixmap (invalid Pixmap parameter) 4 Major opcode: 54 Minor opcode: 0 Resource id: 0x1431a5c X Error: BadMatch (invalid parameter attributes) 8 Major opcode: 158 Minor opcode: 6 Resource id: 0x1431a5c --------------------------------------------------
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but the maintainers need more information to fix the bug. Could you please answer the questions in the other report in order to help the developers? *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 455036 ***