Bug 457305 – crash in Calendar: nothing

After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.

Bug 457305 - crash in Calendar: nothing


Summary:	crash in Calendar: nothing


Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 467763

Product:	evolution
Classification:	Applications
Component:	Calendar
Version:	unspecified
Hardware:	Other All

Importance:	High critical
Target Milestone:	---
Assigned To:	evolution-calendar-maintainers
QA Contact:	Evolution QA team

URL:
Whiteboard:

Duplicates:	457306 457948 458032 468515 471632 472884 493764 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2007-07-16 09:20 UTC by lidanq
Modified:	2007-11-05 17:59 UTC

See Also:
GNOME target:	---
GNOME version:	2.17/2.18

Description lidanq 2007-07-16 09:20:03 UTC

What were you doing when the application crashed?
nothing


Distribution: Fedora release 7 (Moonshine)
Gnome Release: 2.18.0 2007-03-23 (Red Hat, Inc)
BugBuddy Version: 2.18.0

System: Linux 2.6.20-2925.9.fc7xen #1 SMP Tue May 22 08:53:03 EDT 2007 i686
X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation
X Vendor Release: 10300000
Selinux: Enforcing
Accessibility: Disabled
GTK+ Theme: Clearlooks
Icon Theme: Fedora

Memory status: size: 217702400 vsize: 217702400 resident: 68796416 share: 21606400 rss: 68796416 rss_rlim: 4294967295
CPU usage: start_time: 1184575408 rtime: 4013 utime: 3533 stime: 480 cutime:0 cstime: 0 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/evolution'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/i686/nosegneg/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1208887584 (LWP 5257)]
[New Thread -1295946864 (LWP 6787)]
[New Thread -1352053872 (LWP 6601)]
[New Thread -1245590640 (LWP 5303)]
[New Thread -1227527280 (LWP 5266)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0x0068c402 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

+ Trace 148318

Thread 1 (Thread -1208887584 (LWP 5257))

#0 __kernel_vsyscall
#1 waitpid
from /lib/i686/nosegneg/libpthread.so.0
#2 ??
from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
#3 ??
#4 <signal handler called>
#5 em_format_set_inline
from /usr/lib/evolution/2.10/components/libevolution-mail.so
#6 ??
from /usr/lib/evolution/2.10/components/libevolution-mail.so
#7 ??
from /usr/lib/evolution/2.10/components/libevolution-mail.so
#8 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#9 g_closure_invoke
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#10 ??
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#11 g_signal_emit_valist
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#12 g_signal_emit
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#13 gtk_button_clicked
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#14 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#15 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#16 ??
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#17 g_closure_invoke
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#18 ??
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#19 g_signal_emit_valist
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#20 g_signal_emit
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#21 gtk_button_released
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#22 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#23 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#24 ??
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#25 g_closure_invoke
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#26 ??
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#27 g_signal_emit_valist
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#28 g_signal_emit
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#29 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#30 gtk_propagate_event
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#31 gtk_main_do_event
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#32 ??
from /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
#33 g_main_context_dispatch
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#34 ??
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#35 g_main_loop_run
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#36 bonobo_main
from /usr/lib/libbonobo-2.so.0
#37 main
#0 __kernel_vsyscall

Comment 1 palfrey 2007-07-19 15:11:00 UTC

*** Bug 458032 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 2 palfrey 2007-08-17 13:02:49 UTC

*** Bug 457306 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 3 palfrey 2007-08-17 13:08:55 UTC

*** Bug 457948 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 4 palfrey 2007-08-20 16:36:00 UTC

*** Bug 468515 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 5 Lucky Wankhede 2007-08-22 11:51:31 UTC


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 467763 ***

Comment 6 palfrey 2007-08-30 16:35:38 UTC

*** Bug 471632 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 7 palfrey 2007-09-03 16:49:24 UTC

*** Bug 472884 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 8 palfrey 2007-11-05 17:59:12 UTC

*** Bug 493764 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***