After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 456193 - crash in Tasks: trying to send email thr...
crash in Tasks: trying to send email thr...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 450301
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: Tasks
unspecified
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: evolution-calendar-maintainers
Evolution QA team
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2007-07-12 11:00 UTC by mahajan.deepak
Modified: 2007-07-12 11:20 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.17/2.18



Description mahajan.deepak 2007-07-12 11:00:36 UTC
Version: 2.10

What were you doing when the application crashed?
trying to send email throguh evolution. Pressed send receive button. 

Send following suggestion to development team.
Another request to add buttons for, when some one only to want send mails  Or receive mails.


Distribution: Fedora release 7 (Moonshine)
Gnome Release: 2.18.3 2007-07-02 (Red Hat, Inc)
BugBuddy Version: 2.18.0

System: Linux 2.6.21-1.3228.fc7 #1 SMP Tue Jun 12 14:56:37 EDT 2007 x86_64
X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation
X Vendor Release: 10300000
Selinux: No
Accessibility: Disabled
GTK+ Theme: Clearlooks
Icon Theme: Fedora

Memory status: size: 642670592 vsize: 642670592 resident: 54108160 share: 34279424 rss: 54108160 rss_rlim: 18446744073709551615
CPU usage: start_time: 1184232806 rtime: 401 utime: 374 stime: 27 cutime:25 cstime: 7 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/evolution'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib64/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 46912522065744 (LWP 10830)]
[New Thread 1094719824 (LWP 14078)]
[New Thread 1115965776 (LWP 14075)]
[New Thread 1147169104 (LWP 14072)]
[New Thread 1105475920 (LWP 13259)]
[New Thread 1084229968 (LWP 13257)]
[New Thread 1105209680 (LWP 10857)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0x00002aaaaacd497f in waitpid () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0

Thread 1 (Thread 46912522065744 (LWP 10830))

  • #0 waitpid
    from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
  • #1 ??
    from /usr/lib64/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #2 <signal handler called>
  • #3 ??
    from /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #4 ??
    from /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #5 ??
    from /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #6 g_slice_free1
    from /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #7 g_slist_foreach
    from /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #8 pango_layout_line_unref
    from /usr/lib64/libpango-1.0.so.0
  • #9 ??
    from /usr/lib64/libpango-1.0.so.0
  • #10 ??
    from /usr/lib64/libpango-1.0.so.0
  • #11 g_object_unref
    from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #12 ??
    from /usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #13 g_closure_invoke
    from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #14 ??
    from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #15 g_signal_emit_valist
    from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #16 g_signal_emit
    from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #17 ??
    from /usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #18 ??
    from /usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #19 ??
    from /usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #20 ??
    from /usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #21 ??
    from /usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #22 ??
    from /usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #23 ??
    from /usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #24 ??
    from /usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #25 ??
    from /usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #26 ??
    from /usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #27 gtk_widget_unparent
    from /usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #28 ??
    from /usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #29 g_closure_invoke
    from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #30 ??
    from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #31 g_signal_emit_valist
    from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #32 g_signal_emit
    from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #33 ??
    from /usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #34 g_object_run_dispose
    from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #35 ??
    from /usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #36 g_closure_invoke
    from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #37 ??
    from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #38 g_signal_emit_valist
    from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #39 g_signal_emit
    from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #40 ??
    from /usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #41 g_object_run_dispose
    from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #42 ??
    from /usr/lib64/evolution/2.10/components/libevolution-mail.so
  • #43 ??
    from /usr/lib64/evolution/2.10/components/libevolution-mail.so
  • #44 g_main_context_dispatch
    from /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #45 ??
    from /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #46 g_main_loop_run
    from /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #47 bonobo_main
    from /usr/lib64/libbonobo-2.so.0
  • #48 main
  • #0 waitpid
    from /lib64/libpthread.so.0


----------- .xsession-errors (256 sec old) ---------------------
(evolution:10830): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: gsignal.c:1669: signal `source_selected' is invalid for instance `0x854b00'
(evolution:10830): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_hash_table_lookup: assertion `hash_table != NULL' failed
(evolution:10830): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_hash_table_lookup: assertion `hash_table != NULL' failed
(evolution:10830): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_hash_table_lookup: assertion `hash_table != NULL' failed
(evolution:10830): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_hash_table_lookup: assertion `hash_table != NULL' failed
(evolution:10830): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_hash_table_lookup: assertion `hash_table != NULL' failed
(evolution:10830): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_hash_table_lookup: assertion `hash_table != NULL' failed
(evolution:10830): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_hash_table_lookup: assertion `hash_table != NULL' failed
--------------------------------------------------
Comment 1 palfrey 2007-07-12 11:20:54 UTC
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but the maintainers need more information to fix the bug. Could you please answer the questions in the other report in order to help the developers?

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 450301 ***