GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 455329
crash in camel_message_info_ptr?
Last modified: 2007-12-02 15:20:59 UTC
Version: 2.10 What were you doing when the application crashed? Distribution: Fedora release 7 (Moonshine) Gnome Release: 2.18.2 2007-05-28 (Red Hat, Inc) BugBuddy Version: 2.18.0 System: Linux 2.6.21-1.3228.fc7 #1 SMP Tue Jun 12 15:37:31 EDT 2007 i686 X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation X Vendor Release: 10300000 Selinux: Permissive Accessibility: Disabled GTK+ Theme: Clearlooks Icon Theme: Fedora Memory status: size: 173535232 vsize: 173535232 resident: 73244672 share: 41725952 rss: 73244672 rss_rlim: 4294967295 CPU usage: start_time: 1183990200 rtime: 10217 utime: 7496 stime: 2721 cutime:43 cstime: 56 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100 Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/evolution' (no debugging symbols found) Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1". (no debugging symbols found) [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread -1208961312 (LWP 2136)] [New Thread -1352651888 (LWP 4465)] [New Thread -1255154800 (LWP 2200)] [New Thread -1310307440 (LWP 2185)] [New Thread -1287017584 (LWP 2174)] [New Thread -1265644656 (LWP 2172)] 0x00adb402 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
+ Trace 146848
Thread 2 (Thread -1352651888 (LWP 4465))
----------- .xsession-errors --------------------- warning: the debug information found in "/usr/lib/debug//usr/lib/evolution/2.10/plugins/liborg-gnome-evolution-bbdb.so.debug" does not match "/usr/lib/evolution/2.10/plugins/liborg-gnome-evolution-bbd warning: the debug information found in "/usr/lib/debug//usr/lib/gtkhtml/libgnome-gtkhtml-editor-3.14.so.debug" does not match "/usr/lib/gtkhtml/libgnome-gtkhtml-editor-3.14.so" (CRC mismatch). warning: the debug information found in "/usr/lib/debug//usr/lib/evolution/2.10/plugins/liborg-gnome-prefer-plain.so.debug" does not match "/usr/lib/evolution/2.10/plugins/liborg-gnome-prefer-plain.so warning: the debug information found in "/usr/lib/debug//usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/loaders/libpixbufloader-jpeg.so.debug" does not match "/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/loaders/libpixbufloader-jpeg.so" (CRC mis warning: the debug information found in "/usr/lib/debug//usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/loaders/libpixbufloader-gif.so.debug" does not match "/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/loaders/libpixbufloader-gif.so" (CRC misma --------------------------------------------------
*** Bug 458128 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 467460 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 464088 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 464399 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 465518 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 465787 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 479122 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 425978 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 448012 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 449277 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 468956 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 472024 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 450975 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 476357 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 479802 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 476602 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 478190 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 478029 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 442244 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 443948 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 474234 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 458709 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 468082 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 478074 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 478953 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Dear reporter, thanks for taking the time to report this bug. Unfortunately, that stack trace is missing some elements that will help a lot to solve the problem, so it will be hard for the developers to fix that crash. Can you get us a stack trace with debugging symbols[1]? Please see http://live.gnome.org/GettingTraces for more information on how to do so and reopen this bug or report a new one. Thanks in advance! [1] Debug packages for evolution, evolution-data-server, evolution-exchange, gtkhtml and ORBit.
This is a Fedora-specific bug that has since been fixed: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=238497 Closing as NOTGNOME.
Gah, I think I was too hasty. The stacktrace don't match up exactly. Do we have *any* good stacktraces for this bug? I need to see debug symbols for evolution-data-server.
*** Bug 488963 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
NEEDINFO according to comment #26
*** Bug 487462 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 487348 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 487891 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 489602 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
(In reply to comment #26) > Dear reporter, thanks for taking the time to report this bug. > > Unfortunately, that stack trace is missing some elements that will help a lot > to solve the problem, so it will be hard for the developers to fix that crash. > Can you get us a stack trace with debugging symbols[1]? Please see > http://live.gnome.org/GettingTraces for more information on how to do so and > reopen this bug or report a new one. Thanks in advance! > > [1] Debug packages for evolution, evolution-data-server, evolution-exchange, > gtkhtml and ORBit. > Sorry, not running FC7 any more so unable to reproduce this bug. FC7 is to unstable as a daily desktop at work, now running Ubunu 7.10 with a very stable Evolution. Cheers, Andre
*** Bug 491770 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 492148 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 496555 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 498616 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
We have a nice stacktrace in bug 499975. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 499975 ***