Bug 451911 – crash in Tasks:

After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.

Bug 451911 - crash in Tasks:


Summary:	crash in Tasks:


Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 440388

Product:	evolution
Classification:	Applications
Component:	Tasks
Version:	unspecified
Hardware:	Other All

Importance:	High critical
Target Milestone:	---
Assigned To:	evolution-calendar-maintainers
QA Contact:	Evolution QA team

URL:
Whiteboard:

Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2007-06-28 15:08 UTC by umina
Modified:	2007-06-29 11:25 UTC

See Also:
GNOME target:	---
GNOME version:	2.17/2.18

Description umina 2007-06-28 15:08:02 UTC

Version: 2.10

What were you doing when the application crashed?



Distribution: Fedora release 7 (Moonshine)
Gnome Release: 2.18.2 2007-05-28 (Red Hat, Inc)
BugBuddy Version: 2.18.0

System: Linux 2.6.21-1.3228.fc7 #1 SMP Tue Jun 12 15:37:31 EDT 2007 i686
X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation
X Vendor Release: 10300000
Selinux: Permissive
Accessibility: Disabled
GTK+ Theme: Clearlooks
Icon Theme: Clearlooks

Memory status: size: 224354304 vsize: 224354304 resident: 82341888 share: 64667648 rss: 82341888 rss_rlim: 4294967295
CPU usage: start_time: 1183016958 rtime: 1313 utime: 1202 stime: 111 cutime:3 cstime: 9 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/evolution'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1208453408 (LWP 12272)]
[New Thread -1429701744 (LWP 13186)]
[New Thread -1387742320 (LWP 12398)]
[New Thread -1299186800 (LWP 12338)]
[New Thread -1287234672 (LWP 12310)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0x00d42402 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

+ Trace 144343

Thread 1 (Thread -1208453408 (LWP 12272))

#0 __kernel_vsyscall
#1 waitpid
from /lib/libpthread.so.0
#2 ??
from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
#3 ??
#4 <signal handler called>
#5 ??
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#6 ??
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#7 ??
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#8 g_slice_free_chain_with_offset
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#9 g_slist_free
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#10 pango_attr_list_unref
from /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0
#11 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#12 g_object_unref
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#13 g_object_run_dispose
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#14 gtk_object_destroy
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#15 gtk_widget_destroy
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#16 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#17 gtk_container_foreach
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#18 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#19 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#20 ??
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#21 g_closure_invoke
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#22 ??
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#23 g_signal_emit_valist
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#24 g_signal_emit
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#25 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#26 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#27 g_object_run_dispose
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#28 gtk_object_destroy
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#29 gtk_widget_destroy
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#30 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#31 gtk_container_foreach
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#32 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#33 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#34 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#35 ??
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#36 g_closure_invoke
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#37 ??
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#38 g_signal_emit_valist
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#39 g_signal_emit
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#40 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#41 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#42 g_object_run_dispose
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#43 gtk_object_destroy
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#44 gtk_widget_destroy
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#45 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#46 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#47 gtk_container_foreach
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#48 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#49 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#50 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#51 ??
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#52 g_closure_invoke
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#53 ??
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#54 g_signal_emit_valist
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#55 g_signal_emit
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#56 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#57 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#58 g_object_run_dispose
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#59 gtk_object_destroy
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#60 gtk_widget_destroy
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#61 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#62 gtk_container_foreach
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#63 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#64 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#65 ??
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#66 g_closure_invoke
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#67 ??
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#68 g_signal_emit_valist
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#69 g_signal_emit
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#70 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#71 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#72 g_object_run_dispose
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#73 gtk_object_destroy
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#74 gtk_widget_destroy
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#75 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#76 gtk_container_foreach
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#77 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#78 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#79 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#80 ??
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#81 g_closure_invoke
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#82 ??
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#83 g_signal_emit_valist
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#84 g_signal_emit
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#85 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#86 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#87 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#88 g_object_run_dispose
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#89 gtk_object_destroy
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#90 gtk_widget_destroy
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#91 ??
from /usr/lib/evolution/2.10/components/libevolution-mail.so
#92 ??
from /usr/lib/evolution/2.10/components/libevolution-mail.so
#93 ??
from /usr/lib/evolution/2.10/components/libevolution-mail.so
#94 ??
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#95 g_main_context_dispatch
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#96 ??
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#97 g_main_loop_run
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#98 bonobo_main
from /usr/lib/libbonobo-2.so.0
#99 main
#0 __kernel_vsyscall



----------- .xsession-errors (34 sec old) ---------------------
BBDB spinning up...
(evolution:12272): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: gsignal.c:1669: signal `source_selected' is invalid for instance `0xa71c000'
(evolution:12272): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: gsignal.c:1669: signal `source_selected' is invalid for instance `0xa71c120'
(evolution:12272): e-data-server-DEBUG: Loading categories from "/home/umina/.evolution/categories.xml"
(evolution:12272): e-data-server-DEBUG: Loaded 29 categories
(evolution:12272): e-data-server-ui-WARNING **: Key file does not have key 'smtp:__umina%40wt6g.com;auth_LOGIN@smtp.1and1.com_'
(evolution:12272): e-utils-WARNING **: Cannot resolve symbol 'org_gnome_new_mail_config' in plugin '/usr/lib/evolution/2.10/plugins/liborg-gnome-new-mail-notify.so' (not exported?)
(evolution:12272): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: gsignal.c:1669: signal `source_selected' is invalid for instance `0xa71c480'
(evolution:12272): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: gsignal.c:1669: signal `source_selected' is invalid for instance `0xa71c5a0'
--------------------------------------------------

Comment 1 palfrey 2007-06-29 11:25:26 UTC

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but the maintainers need more information to fix the bug. Could you please answer the questions in the other report in order to help the developers?


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 440388 ***