After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 447874 - crash in System Log: What I was doing? Starti...
crash in System Log: What I was doing? Starti...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 364106
Product: gnome-utils
Classification: Deprecated
Component: logview
2.16.x
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: gnome-utils Maintainers
gnome-utils Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2007-06-15 12:58 UTC by jacco
Modified: 2007-06-17 23:05 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.15/2.16


Description jacco 2007-06-15 12:58:55 UTC 
Version: 2.16.1

What were you doing when the application crashed?
What I was doing? Starting it, that's all. Pretty horrible for an application that's basically a glorified "tail -f".


Distribution: Ubuntu 6.10 (edgy)
Gnome Release: 2.16.1 2006-10-02 (Ubuntu)
BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0

Memory status: size: 29798400 vsize: 0 resident: 29798400 share: 0 rss: 12148736 rss_rlim: 0
CPU usage: start_time: 1181912112 rtime: 0 utime: 35 stime: 0 cutime:33 cstime: 0 timeout: 2 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 0

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/gnome-system-log'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1224755008 (LWP 24670)]
0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

+ Trace 141196

Thread 1 (Thread -1224755008 (LWP 24670))

  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #1 __waitpid_nocancel
    from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0
  • #2 gnome_gtk_module_info_get
    from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #3 <signal handler called>
  • #4 ??
  • #5 ??
  • #6 ??
  • #7 ??
  • #8 g_free
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #9 ??
  • #10 ??
  • #11 ??
  • #12 ??
  • #13 ??
  • #14 ??
  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall 






Comment 1


Pedro Villavicencio





          2007-06-17 23:05:23 UTC
        



Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but we are happy to tell you that the problem has already been fixed. It should be solved in the next software version. You may want to check for a software upgrade.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 364106 ***